Comprendre la note d'annulation du 28 janvier 2025 sur le TPS (statut temporaire de protection) du Venezuela

Angelica Rice • January 31, 2025

Click here to read this article in English

Le 28 janvier 2025, la secrétaire à la sécurité intérieure Kristi Noem a annulé la décision prise le 10 janvier 2025 par l'ancien secrétaire Alejandro Mayorkas, qui avait prolongé la désignation du statut de protection temporaire (TPS) pour le Venezuela jusqu'en 2023, et a ordonné que son avis du 17 janvier 2025 désignant à nouveau le TPS pour le Venezuela soit annulé. Cette décision a, à juste titre, suscité la confusion et l'inquiétude parmi les bénéficiaires vénézuéliens du TPS et les personnes dont la demande est en cours d'examen.


Il est essentiel de préciser que cela ne signifie pas que le programme TPS pour le Venezuela a été supprimé. Au contraire, le ministère de la sécurité intérieure (DHS) doit maintenant réexaminer s'il convient de redésigner (prolonger) ou de mettre fin aux désignations antérieures du TPS pour le Venezuela pour les années 2021 et 2023.

Que signifie l'annulation ?

Étant donné que l'extension du TPS du 17 janvier 2025 a été annulée, la désignation valide la plus récente du TPS pour le Venezuela reste celle du 3 octobre 2023. L'annulation n'affecte pas immédiatement les protections du TPS pour les personnes couvertes par les désignations précédentes. Toutefois, le DHS doit prendre des décisions importantes dans les mois à venir :

  • D'ici le 1er février 2025, le DHS doit décider de prolonger ou de mettre fin à la désignation du 3 octobre 2023.


  • D'ici le 12 juillet 2025, le DHS doit décider s'il prolonge ou met fin à la désignation du 9 mars 2021.


  • Si le secrétaire ne prend pas de décision dans les délais (par exemple, si le secrétaire ne décide pas avant le 1er février 2025 de prolonger ou de mettre fin à la désignation TPS du Venezuela de 2023), la loi prévoit une prolongation automatique de la désignation pour une période supplémentaire de 6 mois. INA 244(b)(3)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(3)(C).


Jusqu'à ce que ces décisions soient prises,
le TPS reste en vigueur en vertu des désignations précédentes, et les personnes qui ont déjà bénéficié du TPS ne sont pas immédiatement affectées.

Qui est concerné et que devez-vous faire ?

Titulaires actuels du TPS

Si vous avez déjà obtenu le TPS en vertu des désignations du 9 mars 2021 ou du 3 octobre 2023, votre statut reste valide. Vous devez continuer à vous conformer à toutes les exigences de réenregistrement pour maintenir votre protection et votre autorisation de travail.

Période de réenregistrement :

  • Les bénéficiaires du TPS sous les désignations 2021 et 2023 doivent se réenregistrer entre le 17 janvier 2025 et le 10 septembre 2025 pour maintenir leur statut légal et leur autorisation de travail.


Personnes dont la demande de TPS est en cours au 17 janvier 2025

Si vous avez déposé une demande de TPS avant le 17 janvier 2025 au titre d'une désignation antérieure, le traitement de votre demande se poursuivra. Si votre demande est approuvée, votre protection TPS restera valable au moins jusqu'au 2 avril 2025. Il n'est pas nécessaire de déposer une nouvelle demande.


Personnes ayant déposé une demande de TPS entre le 10 janvier 2025 et le 28 janvier 2025

Si vous avez demandé le TPS pendant cette période, l'USCIS cessera de traiter vos demandes et remboursera tous les frais payés en rapport avec ces demandes. En outre, l'USCIS invalidera les EAD, les formulaires 1-797, Notice of Action (Approval Notice), et les formulaires I-94, Arrival/Departure Record (collectivement connus sous le nom de documents liés au TPS) qui ont été délivrés avec des dates d'expiration du 2 octobre 2026 en vertu de l'avis Mayorkas du 17 janvier 2025. 

Que se passera-t-il ensuite ?

Étant donné le soutien antérieur de l'administration Biden au TPS, beaucoup s'attendent à ce que le DHS prolonge ou redésigne le Venezuela pour le TPS plutôt que d'y mettre fin. Toutefois, aucune décision finale n'a été prise et les ressortissants vénézuéliens bénéficiant du TPS ou dont la demande est en cours doivent continuer à suivre de près l'évolution de la situation.

Que devez-vous faire maintenant ?

  • Si vous bénéficiez actuellement du TPS, continuez à vous conformer à toutes les exigences de renouvellement du TPS et restez au courant des décisions à venir du DHS.

  • Si vous avez une demande en cours, vérifiez régulièrement les mises à jour de l'USCIS et consultez un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration pour obtenir les dernières informations.


  • Si vous avez déposé votre demande entre le 17 janvier 2025 et le 28 janvier 2025, demandez l'aide d'un avocat pour comprendre comment l'annulation peut affecter votre demande.


Restez informé et obtenez des conseils juridiques

Notre cabinet d'immigration suit de près ces développements et fournira des mises à jour dès que le DHS aura pris sa décision. Si vous avez des questions sur votre statut TPS ou sur l'impact de ce mémo sur votre dossier, contactez notre cabinet dès aujourd'hui pour une consultation.

Pour plus d'informations, consultez l'avis officiel du DHS sur l'annulation :
Vacatur of 2025TemporaryProtected Status Decision for Venezuela
. (Vacatur de la décision relative au statut de protection temporaire de 2025 pour le Venezuela).


Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Angelica Rice


By Kris Quadros-Ragar May 14, 2026
Holding a U.S. visa does not guarantee permanent entry. The Department of State can cancel a visa after it is issued through a process called “prudential visa revocation.” These revocations have surged throughout 2025 and 2026. This increase is a direct result of enhanced vetting and increased data sharing between government agencies. Through the Continuous Vetting Center, law enforcement and immigration databases are now cross-referenced in real time, allowing officials to flag and revoke visas the moment new information surfaces or updated information is received, such as a past criminal arrest or a security alert. What is Prudential Visa Revocation? A prudential revocation is a precautionary cancellation. It happens when new information suggests a traveler might be ineligible for a visa or could pose a safety concern. A revocation cancels your visa, but it does not automatically end your status if you are already inside the U.S. and following the rules of your stay. Common triggers include: Criminal Arrests (DUI/DWI): Even a previous incident or single arrest without a conviction can trigger an immediate revocation. Security Alerts: New hits on watchlists or intelligence databases. Loss of Eligibility: Such as losing a job or failing to maintain student status. Fraud: Discovery of errors or lies on previous applications. The DOS usually notifies individuals via the email address listed on their DS-160 application. However, many travelers reportedly only discover the revocation when they are denied boarding at the airport. If your visa is revoked while you are in the U.S., you can typically remain in the country until the date on your Form I-94 expires, provided you continue to follow all terms of your stay. However, you should avoid international travel until you consult with legal counsel, as leaving the U.S. will require you to apply for a brand-new visa to re-enter. This application process may involve extra scrutiny, such as medical evaluations or supplemental documentation - especially if the revocation was triggered by a DUI or DWI. If your visa has been revoked and you need to discuss your legal options, please contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for guidance.
By Rabia Elhage May 7, 2026
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has recently updated its protocols regarding the screening and vetting of immigration benefit applications. These changes involve a more detailed review process that may impact processing times and evidence requirements for various categories of benefits. Key Changes to the Adjudication Process The updated guidance outlines several shifts in how USCIS processes and reviews applications: Adjustment of EAD Validity Periods: For certain categories, the validity periods of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) may be shortened. This can result in more frequent eligibility reviews throughout the application process. Expanded Use of Social Media and Financial Data: Adjudicators have been granted broader authority to review an applicant’s social media activity and financial history during the vetting process. Policy Updates on Biometric Verification: The agency is revising its approach to biometric identity verification, including the reuse of fingerprints and photographs. Country-Specific Scrutiny: USCIS is coordinating with the Department of State to apply specific analysis to applications based on regional risk factors and fraud indicators. Impact on Interviews and Processing Applicants for adjustment of status, naturalization, and other benefits may encounter more focused questioning during interviews. USCIS is now tailoring its interview process to address potential red flags associated with specific geographic regions or benefit categories. Because of this increased scrutiny, it is essential that all information provided in an application is consistent with an applicant's public record and digital footprint. Discrepancies or incomplete documentation can result in delays or additional requests for evidence. Next Steps As these procedures are implemented, applicants should ensure that all submitted materials are accurate and verifiable. We recommend a thorough review of all public information and documentation prior to filing. If you have questions regarding how these procedural changes may affect your specific case, our team is available to discuss the current requirements and help navigate the updated process.
By Joseph Lennarz April 23, 2026
Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.
Show More