Politiques en matière de travail à distance - Puis-je travailler à distance aux États-Unis avec mon visa?
Monica Zafra • August 30, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
Le facteur le plus important pour travailler à distance aux États-Unis est l'obtention d'une autorisation de travail en bonne et due forme. La loi américaine sur l'immigration exige que toute personne qui gagne un revenu aux États-Unis dispose d'une autorisation de travail en bonne et due forme.
Que se passe-t-il si je gagne un revenu pour un employeur étranger alors que je suis aux États-Unis ?
Même si le travailleur travaille pour un employeur à l'étranger, le fait de travailler pendant qu'il se trouve physiquement aux États-Unis est toujours considéré comme un travail par le gouvernement américain, même si le travailleur est payé sur un compte bancaire à l'étranger. Par exemple, si un détenteur de visa B-1/B-2 se rend aux États-Unis pour le tourisme ou à des fins professionnelles spécifiques, il peut entrer aux États-Unis pour passer des vacances ou assister à des réunions ou à des événements, mais il ne peut pas travailler aux États-Unis, car le visa B-1/B-2 n'accorde pas d'autorisation de travail.
Comment puis-je travailler à distance ?
Il n'existe pas de catégorie de visa désignée pour les travailleurs à distance aux États-Unis, mais il existe des visas de non-immigrant qui sont flexibles. Les visas de travail non immigrants tels que E, L, TN, F-1, OPT, P-1 et O-1 ne sont pas soumis à des restrictions quant au lieu de travail, contrairement à d'autres visas, et il existe une certaine flexibilité en ce qui concerne le travail à distance. Par exemple, les athlètes P-1 peuvent voyager pour travailler en raison de leur profession, ou les professionnels O-1 également, mais ils doivent le faire dans les limites de leur visa.
Quels sont les travailleurs soumis à des restrictions en matière de travail à distance ?
Les travailleurs H-1B ne peuvent travailler que dans les lieux énumérés dans leur demande de parrainage H-1B. Cela est dû à l'exigence de la demande de conditions de travail (LCA) et à l'analyse des salaires en vigueur. Parfois, les travailleurs H-1B peuvent être amenés à travailler "occasionnellement à distance" à la demande de leur employeur. C'est le cas lorsque l'adresse du domicile du travailleur H-1B est proche et que le lieu de travail normal indiqué dans la LCA de l'employeur comprend l'adresse du domicile. Cette situation peut également se produire si le travailleur H-1B est amené à travailler à une distance importante du lieu de travail indiqué dans le LCA. Des demandes de modification et des frais de dépôt peuvent également être exigés.
Pour les parrainages H-1B, il peut être utile pour les employeurs d'inclure comme lieu de travail l'adresse du domicile de l'employé et le lieu de travail habituel, si cela est possible. L'USCIS a annulé deux notes directives concernant les placements sur des sites tiers et les itinéraires connexes pour les travailleurs H-1B, de sorte qu'il est plus facile d'indiquer l'adresse du domicile et le lieu de travail d'un travailleur H-1B.
Si vous avez des questions concernant ces informations, veuillez contacter nos bureaux.
Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.
Monica Zafra
Similar Posts
What is E-Verify+? E-Verify+ is the newest version of E-Verify, a system run by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to help employers confirm the work eligibility of their employees. Effective October 21, 2024, E-Verify+ includes new features designed to streamline the employment verification process and ensure more accurate, secure results for both employers and employees. The E-Verify system checks a person’s work eligibility by comparing information from their Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) with records from DHS and the Social Security Administration (SSA). E-Verify+ takes this process further with enhanced capabilities and updated features, which make verification faster, more reliable, and more user-friendly. What’s New in E-Verify+? Automated Work Authorization Extensions For employees who are renewing work authorization, E-Verify+ can now provide automatic updates if the renewal process is delayed. This minimizes disruptions for both employers and employees, ensuring that work authorization continues as long as the renewal is in process. Enhanced Accuracy with Biometric Verification One of the key updates in E-Verify+ is biometric verification, which uses fingerprints or other biometrics to confirm an employee’s identity more accurately. This feature is expected to reduce identity theft and improve the reliability of work authorization checks. Simplified Case Management System E-Verify+ includes an updated case management system that allows employers to resolve discrepancies and update information more efficiently. For instance, if there is a mismatch between an employee’s Form I-9 and government records, E-Verify+ will guide employers on next steps to quickly address the issue. Integration with EAD (Employment Authorization Document) Updates Employees applying for Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) will find that E-Verify+ now includes an integration feature that tracks the status of EAD renewals and provides employers with updates on pending applications. What Does This Mean for Employers? With E-Verify+, employers benefit from a more efficient and reliable employment verification process. Employers who participate in E-Verify+ are better equipped to avoid penalties for hiring unauthorized workers while also reducing administrative burdens associated with verification. The system’s enhanced automation helps streamline the hiring process, which can save time and resources for businesses. What Does This Mean for Employees? For employees, E-Verify+ provides greater security and transparency. Automated work authorization extensions can help prevent employment gaps due to delays in authorization processing, which is especially important for those relying on renewals. Additionally, the use of biometrics means employees can be assured that their personal identity is protected during verification. If you want to find out more about E-Verify or want to better understand the employment verification process, please contact one of our experienced Immigration Attorneys!
The answer is: YES! Social media influencers and content producers with a large online following can qualify for an O-1 temporary work visa or an EB-1 green card, often referred to as "talent visas" or "extraordinary ability green cards."
The answer to the question above is, depending on your circumstances, yes! USCIS has established very clear criteria for when a request to expedite a pending travel permit application can be made. These criteria include: Severe financial loss to a company or person, provided that the need for urgent action is not the result of the petitioner’s or applicant’s failure to: Timely file the benefit request, or Timely respond to any requests for additional evidence; A company can demonstrate that it would suffer a severe financial loss if it is at risk of failing, losing a critical contract, or having to lay off other employees. For example, a medical office may suffer severe financial loss if a gap in a doctor’s employment authorization would require the medical practice to lay off its medical assistants. Job loss may be sufficient to establish severe financial loss for a person, depending on the individual circumstances. For example, the inability to travel for work that would result in job loss might warrant expedited treatment. The need to obtain employment authorization by itself, without evidence of other compelling factors, does not warrant expedited treatment. In addition, severe financial loss may also be established where failure to expedite would result in a loss of critical public benefits or services. Emergencies and urgent humanitarian reasons; In the context of an expedite request, humanitarian reasons are those related to human welfare. Examples may include, but are not limited to, illness, disability, extreme living conditions, death in the family, or a critical need to travel to obtain medical treatment in a limited amount of time. An emergency may include an urgent need to expedite employment authorization for healthcare workers during a national emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonprofit organization (as designated by the Internal Revenue Service) whose request is in furtherance of the cultural or social interests of the United States; A nonprofit organization seeking to expedite a beneficiary’s benefit request must demonstrate an urgent need to expedite the case based on the beneficiary’s specific role within the nonprofit in furthering cultural or social interests (as opposed to the organization’s role in furthering social or cultural interests). Examples may include a medical professional urgently needed for medical research related to a specific social U.S. interest (such as the COVID-19 pandemic or other socially impactful research or project) or a university professor urgently needed to participate in a specific and imminent cultural program. Another example is a religious organization that urgently needs a beneficiary’s specific services and skill set to continue a vital social outreach program. U.S. government interests (such cases identified as urgent by federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board, Equal Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, or other public safety or national security interests); or U.S. government interests may include, but are not limited to, cases identified as urgent by other government agencies, including labor and employment agencies, and public safety or national security interests. Clear USCIS error. Not every circumstance that fits in one of these categories will result in expedited processing; expedite requests are discretionary, highly subjective and never guaranteed. Expedite requests are initiated by calling the USCIS contact center and providing your case Receipt Number and reasons for the request. The approximate processing time for an expedite request is 7-10 business days. When you call to request expedited processing, the USCIS Contact Center creates and forwards a service request to the office with jurisdiction over your application or petition. After receiving the service request, the reviewing office may request additional documentation to support expedited processing. A decision on an expedite request is not an approval or a denial of the underlying benefit request. The expedite decision simply informs the requestor whether USCIS will take the benefit request out of date order and issue a decision (approval or denial) faster than the normal processing time.
In years past, spouses of certain E and L visa categories were required to apply for and receive an Employment Authorization Document in order to work in the United States. However, as the result of a settlement reached by USCIS in the class action lawsuit Shergill v. Mayorkas on November 10, 2021, USCIS now considers E and L dependent spouses to be authorized for employment incident to their status.
Family-based immigration remains one of the most common paths to lawful permanent residency in the United States. It offers a lifeline to families hoping to reunite across borders, but the process is far from simple. The outcome of the applications can be delayed as a result of potential missteps while preparing the applications. Here are some of the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them: Incomplete or Inaccurate Forms One frequent mistake is submitting incomplete or inaccurate information on the forms like the I-130 (Petition for Alien Relative) and the I-485 (Adjustment of Status). Even minor errors such as misspelled names, missing signatures, or incorrect dates—can result in Requests for Evidence. To avoid this misstep, double-check all entries, cross-reference documents, and consult with an attorney before submission. Remember, immigration forms are legal documents so accuracy matters. Insufficient Supporting Evidence Proving a genuine familial relationship is the basis of family-based petitions. For spousal cases, USCIS looks closely at evidence of a bona fide marriage. Little or no supporting documents and evidence may lead to Requests for Evidence and even skepticism from USCIS. To establish a bona fide marriage, include documentation to show shared finances and liabilities. Filing Under the Wrong Category or Preference There are different immigration paths depending on whether the petitioner is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, and whether the beneficiary is a spouse, child, sibling, or parent. Each category has different processing times and visa availability. It is critical that before applying, you understand which preference category applies to your case. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (spouses, parents, unmarried children under 21) generally receive faster processing and are not subject to annual visa caps. Not Disclosing Past Immigration or Criminal History Many applicants fail to account for past immigration violations such as visa overstays, unauthorized work, or prior removal orders. Similarly, if you fail to disclose past criminal history and these issues surface later in the process they can affect the outcome of the case. Disclose everything to your attorney, no matter how minor or old the issue seems. Prior violations don’t always mean denial but not disclosing them may lead to serious consequences. If you're considering filing a family-based petition, consult with an experienced immigration attorney at our office. Our office is committed to helping families navigate this complex process with clarity and confidence.
When applying for a green card or seeking admission into the United States, one of the legal hurdles many applicants may face is the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This test evaluates whether someone is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support. But what exactly does that mean—and what types of public benefits can trigger this issue? In this article, we’ll break down what “public charge” really means, who is affected, what types of public benefits are considered, and what immigrants should be mindful of when making decisions about public programs like Medi-Cal and Medicaid. What Is the Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility? The public charge rule applies to individuals applying for a visa, green card (adjustment of status), or entry into the U.S., unless they fall into an exempt category. Under this rule, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must determine whether the applicant is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. This typically refers to receiving: Public cash assistance for income maintenance (such as SSI or TANF), or Long-term institutional care at government expense. This determination is based on the "totality of circumstances," including age, health, financial resources, education, skills, and whether a sponsor has submitted a valid Affidavit of Support. Who Is Exempt from the Public Charge Rule? Many categories of immigrants are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. These include: Asylees and refugees Special immigrant juveniles Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners T and U visa applicants Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Importantly, even if someone later adjusts status through a different pathway that is subject to public charge, any benefits they received while in an exempt category will not be held against them. What Public Benefits Are Not Considered in the Public Charge Test? It is a common and harmful myth that using any public benefit will jeopardize your immigration status. In fact, most non-cash benefits do not count against you in a public charge determination. According to USCIS and DHS guidance, the following types of assistance (current as of July 1, 2025) are not considered: Health-Related Benefits Medi-Cal/Medicaid, except for long-term institutional care Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Health insurance through the ACA Marketplace, including subsidies COVID-19 testing, vaccines, and treatment Community health services, crisis counseling, and short-term shelters Food and Nutrition SNAP (Food Stamps) WIC School meal programs Food banks and emergency food assistance Housing and Energy Emergency shelter Rental assistance (e.g., McKinney-Vento programs) Energy assistance (e.g., LIHEAP) Education and Childcare Public schooling Head Start Childcare subsidies (e.g., CCDF) Educational grants and scholarships Federal Cash and Tax Benefits Earned income tax credit (EITC) Child Tax Credit (CTC) Stimulus checks Unemployment insurance Social Security and veteran’s benefits Disaster and pandemic-related cash aid In short, just because a benefit is public or government-funded doesn’t automatically make it count against you. A Word of Caution About Medi-Cal and Medicaid, in Particular As of today (07/01/2025), standard use of Medi-Cal (California’s version of Medicaid) or Medicaid for most health-related services is not considered in a public charge determination. This includes preventative care, emergency services, pregnancy-related services, and short-term care. However, if Medicaid is used for long-term institutionalization, such as in a nursing home or psychiatric facility, that does count under the public charge test. Despite current guidance, we are seeing political shifts and changes in tone from the current administration that suggest public charge policies may become more restrictive in the future. This includes renewed interest in expanding the types of public benefits that may be considered, particularly around medical assistance. For that reason, we generally recommend that individuals who are applying for adjustment of status, or who may be subject to the public charge ground in the future, avoid enrolling in Medi-Cal or Medicaid at this time, unless absolutely necessary. Final Thoughts Immigration law is complex, and the rules surrounding public charge can feel confusing or even frightening. But it’s important to understand that using most public benefits—especially for food, education, and healthcare—will not automatically jeopardize your green card or visa application. Still, because policy can change quickly, we urge individuals to consult with an immigration attorney before applying for any public assistance—especially healthcare programs like Medi-Cal or Medicaid. If you have questions or concerns about how public benefits might impact your immigration case, our office is here to help. We are committed to providing up-to-date, personalized guidance to keep your immigration journey on track. Disclaimer The information provided herein is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every immigration case is unique, and the application of the public charge rule may vary depending on your specific situation. If you believe this topic may apply to you or you need individualized legal guidance, we encourage you to contact one of our highly-qualified legal professionals for a consultation and assistance tailored to your circumstances. Resources: USCIS Public Charge Resources ILRC Medi-Cal and Public Charge Alert (2024) California Medi-Cal Immigrant Eligibility FAQ
As an immigration law firm, we regularly assist highly skilled professionals working in the U.S. on temporary work visas such as H-1B who are seeking a path to permanent residency. For many of these individuals, the EB-2 and EB-3 employment-based green card categories are the most pursued—and frequently misunderstood—routes . While both are viable pathways to permanent residency, they differ in meaningful ways that can significantly impact the timing, eligibility, and overall strategy of your case. The EB-2 category is intended for individuals who either hold an advanced degree or demonstrate exceptional ability in their field . Most applicants qualify by having a master’s degree (or higher), or a bachelor’s degree accompanied by at least five years of progressive experience in their profession. There is also a subcategory within EB-2 known as the National Interest Waiver (NIW), which allows qualified individuals to self-petition without employer sponsorship if their work substantially benefits the United States. This route is especially relevant for researchers, entrepreneurs, and professionals in high national interest or mission-critical fields. In contrast, the EB-3 category includes professionals with a bachelor’s degree as well as skilled workers with at least two years of training or experience . While the educational threshold for EB-3 may appear less rigorous, the process itself is equally structured. One key distinction between EB-2 and EB-3 lies in the requirements of the job being offered, not just the applicant’s own credentials. For example, if a position requires only a bachelor’s degree, even a highly qualified candidate with a master’s degree may still fall under EB-3. Regardless of which category applies, most employment-based green card cases begin with the PERM labor certification process . This is a formal procedure overseen by the U.S. Department of Labor, in which the employer must test the labor market and demonstrate that there are no able, willing, qualified, and available U.S. workers for the position. The employer must also agree to pay the prevailing wage as determined by the Department of Labor. This step is both mandatory and highly detail-sensitive; inaccuracies in the job description, recruitment steps, or wage determination can lead to significant delays or even denials. Once PERM certification is approved, the employer files Form I-140 , the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. This petition confirms that the employee meets the requirements for the offered position under either EB-2 or EB-3, and that the employer is financially capable of providing the job as described. If the employee’s priority date—which is based on the date the PERM was filed—is current according to the Department of State’s Visa Bulletin, the individual may then file Form I-485 to adjust their status to lawful permanent resident. One of the more nuanced aspects of this process involves understanding how priority dates and visa backlogs affect the timeline. For applicants from countries with high demand, such as India or China, significant delays are common—particularly under EB-2. Paradoxically, there are times when the EB-3 category moves faster, prompting some applicants to file a second I-140 under EB-3 while retaining the original priority date. This strategy can be effective but requires careful legal planning to ensure it’s done correctly. Another strategic factor is portability. If your I-485 application has been pending for at least 180 days and your I-140 has been approved, you may be eligible to change employers under the AC21 portability provisions, so long as the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification. This flexibility can be critical for employees who experience job changes or promotions during the often lengthy green card process. Ultimately, the choice between EB-2 and EB-3 isn’t about prestige —it’s about aligning your qualifications, the job requirements, and your immigration history with current legal standards and market conditions. The right strategy depends not only on your education and experience, but also on your long-term career goals and country of origin. At our firm, we work closely with both employers and employees to develop individualized immigration strategies that streamline the process and avoid unnecessary setbacks. Whether you're a corporate professional evaluating your green card options or an employer preparing to sponsor a key team member, we offer the insight and experience to move your case forward with confidence.
