¿Qué es el permiso “Parole in Place”?

Denice Flores • October 6, 2023

Click here to read this article in English

      El Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de EE.UU. (USCIS) puede conceder el permiso “Parole in Place” a las familias de militares. Esto es lo que debe saber sobre este permiso.

      Los EE.UU. pueden conceder el permiso “Parole in Place” en el lugar por razones humanitarias urgentes o de beneficio público significativo. INA 212(d)(5)(A).

      El permiso “Parole in Place” se creó para beneficiar a las familias de militares con familiares indocumentados en Estados Unidos. La libertad condicional está destinada a los miembros del servicio militar o a su cónyuge, viuda, padre o madre, hijo o hija. El miembro del servicio debe ser un miembro en servicio activo de las fuerzas armadas de EE.UU., en la reserva seleccionada de la reserva lista, o el miembro del servicio (vivo o fallecido) debe haber servido previamente en servicio activo o en la reserva seleccionada de la reserva lista y debe haber sido dado de baja con honores. 

      Un factor muy importante a tener en cuenta a la hora de determinar si el individuo reúne o no los requisitos para el permiso “Parole in Place”, es que el individuo debe estar presente en Estados Unidos sin haber sido admitido en el país. Esto significa que el individuo debe haber entrado ilegalmente en Estados Unidos. Si, por ejemplo, el individuo fue admitido en Estados Unidos con un visado pero el visado y el estatus legal caducaron más tarde, y el individuo sigue en Estados Unidos, el individuo no reúne los requisitos para el permiso “Parole in Place” porque entró legalmente y fue admitido en Estados Unidos.

      Si la persona es elegible sobre la base de los requisitos anteriores, las siguientes pruebas documentales deben ser presentadas a USCIS, con la solicitud del permiso “Parole in Place”:
  1. Pruebas de la relación familiar, tales como: certificado de matrimonio, documentación de la terminación de un matrimonio anterior, certificado de nacimiento del hijo o hija, certificado de nacimiento del miembro actual o antiguo del servicio con el nombre de los padres; o prueba de inscripción en el Sistema de Informes de Elegibilidad de Inscripción de la Defensa (DEERS);

  2. Prueba de que el familiar es miembro actual o antiguo de las fuerzas armadas de EE.UU;

  3. Los padres de miembros actuales y antiguos de las fuerzas armadas de EE.UU. deben aportar pruebas de que el miembro actual o antiguo del servicio apoya la solicitud del permiso “Parole in Place”;

  4. Pruebas de cualquier factor discrecional favorable adicional que el individuo desee que USCIS considere. La evidencia debe mostrar USCIS la razón humanitaria urgente para la solicitud o el beneficio público significativo de la concesión del permiso “Parole in Place”, y 

  5. Dos fotografías idénticas, tipo pasaporte en color, de la persona que solicita el permiso “Parole in Place”.
      Si USCIS aprueba la solicitud del permiso “Parole in Place”, la persona queda protegida de la deportación y también puede optar a la autorización de empleo. La aprobación del permiso “Parole in Place” autoriza a la persona a permanecer en EE.UU. durante un año. La persona recibe un documento I-94 como prueba de la libertad condicional y el I-94 es prueba de una entrada legal a efectos de otros posibles alivios de inmigración. 

      Tenga en cuenta que el permiso “Parole in Place” no es lo mismo que la acción diferida. La acción diferida tiene diferentes requisitos de elegibilidad. Si usted está buscando hablar con un abogado acerca de la acción diferida, nuestra Firma también le puede ayudar. 

      Si usted tiene alguna pregunta acerca del permiso “Parole in Place” y otras formas potenciales de exención después de que se le haya otorgado el permiso “Parole in Place”, como el ajuste de estatus, por favor programe una consulta con uno de nuestros abogados expertos y estaremos más que encantados de ayudarle.

Este blog no pretende ser asesoramiento jurídico y nada de lo aquí expuesto debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Por favor, programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información leída aquí.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Denice Flores


Similar Posts

By Denice Flores September 3, 2024
On August 26, 2024 , the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in Texas v. Department of Homeland Security , Case Number 24-cv-306 administratively stayed the Department of Homeland Security from granting parole in place under Keeping Families Together for 14 days. In Texas v. DHS , the State of Texas and several other plaintiffs argue that the DHS has implemented policies that they believe violate federal immigration laws. Specifically, they claim that DHS's guidelines on immigration enforcement and deportation procedures are too lenient and do not align with statutory requirements. The plaintiffs argue that these policies undermine state sovereignty and contribute to increased illegal immigration, which they believe has negative repercussions for public safety and resources. During the 14 days, USCIS will not grant any pending parole in place application under Keeping Families Together ; USCIS will continue to accept applications for parole in place for certain noncitizen spouses and stepchildren of U.S. Citizens, and will continue to schedule biometric appointments and capture biometrics for applicants. Note, that the district court’s administrative stay order does not affect any applications that were approved before the administrative stay order was issued on August 26, 2024. As of now, the program is on hold for 14 days, but that hold could be extended while the court considers arguments in the case. If you have any questions or concerns, contact our office to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced immigration attorneys.
By Flavia Santos Lloyd June 20, 2024
On June 18, 2024, President Biden announced a series of immigration actions using the authority granted to him by our existing immigration laws. These actions will help certain undocumented individuals in the United States, including: Spouses and children of U.S. citizens who have been living in the United States for at least 10 years. You may be eligible to apply for your green card without leaving the United States, if, as of June 17, 2024: ○ You are in the United States after entering without permission; ○ You have lived in the United States for at least 10 years and have never left; ○ You are legally married to a U.S. citizen or have a qualifying stepchild relationship with a U.S. citizen; and ○ You do not have certain criminal history or pose a threat to national security or public safety. If you meet these criteria, the government MAY grant you parole-in-place. Parole would be granted for a one-time period of three years. You may also be eligible for employment authorization for up to three years. If you are granted parole y ou may apply for your green card within three years of approval. Eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. College-educated DACA recipients and Dreamers who are qualified for nonimmigrant status, such as an H-1B specialty occupation visa. You may be eligible to apply for a temporary visa more easily, if: ○ You have a degree from an accredited U.S. institution of higher education; and ○ You have an offer of employment from a U.S. employer in a field related to your degree. Please note that these programs have NOT YET begun. Details on how to apply are expected to be released by the end of the summer through a Federal Register notice. This means: You cannot submit an application at this time. An early-filed application will be rejected . You should not pay anyone a fee associated with filing an application at this time. Be patient and take the time to find the right help. The wrong advice could harm your chances of staying in the United States, getting lawful status, or becoming a U.S. citizen. Don't be fooled by notarios and other consultants who promise immediate results or special solutions in order to steal your money. Many unscrupulous individuals will cost more than licensed attorneys! If you are unsure if someone is qualified to help, ask for proof of their credentials and retain a copy of that evidence. This program could also be legally challenged, which could impact its implementation. This makes it even more important to have a qualified, knowledgeable attorney. USE AILA’s Find an Immigration Lawyer Search, ailalawyer.org , to find a licensed immigration attorney in good standing. Or find an accredited representative at: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/find-legal-representation . FONT: https://www.aila.org/library/information-and-guidance-on-new-actions-to-promote-family-unity
Show More
By Juliana LaMendola March 13, 2026
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
By Denice Flores March 6, 2026
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.
By Juliana LaMendola February 19, 2026
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
Show More