What are the qualifications for an EB-1A Visa?

April Perez • January 5, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish

     An EB-1(a) is a visa for those that can prove they have an Extraordinary Ability or Achievement in the sciences, arts, education, business or athletics through sustained national or international acclaim.  

    Sustained national or international acclaim is proven by showing that you have a one-time achievement or major award such as a Nobel Prize, Grammy or an Oscar or that you can meet at least three of the criteria below by providing adequate evidence (examples below):
  • Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence

    Evidence of an award can include: a certificate, a list of the criteria for the award, meaning how the winners are selected, and background on the award to show that it is a national or international award. 

       

  • Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members

    Evidence of membership can include: a membership certificate or letter from an official from the organization verifying your membership. 

    Evidence that the association demands outstanding achievements of their members can include: background on how the members are selected through official website links, background information on who selects the members, bylaws of the organization stating how members are selected and who selects them, background of other members, background on those who select members, articles about the organization, and background links about the organization.


  • Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media

    Evidence of published material should show the source of the publication. You should also provide circulation numbers on the publication if it is in print, if it is an article published through a website it should be a website from a major publication that has a high volume of traffic.

  • Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel

    Evidence of being a judge can include: a letter from the organization you were a judge for or the event you were a judge for explaining how you were selected, what the judging consisted of, and background on the event or organization you were a judge for.


  • Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field

    Evidence that the contribution was original can be:  through a patent, or other verifying documentation. 

    Evidence that it was of major significance can be: shown through application by other organizations in the field of your original contribution, and contracts or letters verifying the wide use of your contribution.


  • Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

    Evidence can include: the article you published, evidence of where it was published, and evidence of the number of times the article was cited by others.


  • Evidence that your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases

    Evidence can include: articles, flyers and other promotional materials for the exhibition. Contracts, and photos of the exhibition. Proof of sales of any work sold at the exhibition.

  • Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations

    Evidence can include: letters from former employers explaining how your work was critical for the organization as a whole. 

    Evidence that the organization is distinguished can be: articles about the organization, awards the organization has won, and background on the organization. 


  • Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field

    Evidence can be: paystubs, income taxes or other proof of payment for work in your field. The payments should be quantified, meaning that you need to prove how much you were paid per hour or per year for your work. 

  • Evidence of your commercial successes in the performing arts

    Evidence can include ticket, record, or video sales or box office receipts.


    This is not an exhaustive list of possible evidence, and in some fields the evidence may not fall directly within the parameters of the criteria.


    Aside from the criteria you must also be able to show that you will continue to work in your field of expertise.


    USCIS will first determine whether you meet at least three of the criteria, and if you do, they will move on to do a final merits determination as to whether you are extraordinary.


    An alien who falls within this category may self-petition by filing the proper forms and evidence. The idea of being “extraordinary” sounds simple, but you must be able to prove that you qualify. It is important to have the proper guidance from an attorney through this process.


This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Similar Posts

By Nikki Breeland March 9, 2021
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
By Nikki Breeland March 9, 2021
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish
Show More
By Juliana LaMendola September 22, 2026
On September 14, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security , halting the implementation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) final rule that was scheduled to eliminate “duration of status” (D/S) on September 15, 2026. As a result of this nationwide order, DHS is blocked from enforcing fixed periods of admission for F-1 students, J-1 exchange visitors, and I media representatives while the litigation moves forward. Because the current “duration of status” framework remains in full effect, F, J, and I visa holders are not required to file Form I-539 extension of stay applications to remain in valid status beyond program end dates at this time. Furthermore, restrictions on academic transfers, constraints on enrolling in second programs at the same degree level, 240-day caps on continued employment while extensions are pending, and shortened grace periods do not apply during the injunction. F-1 nonimmigrants retain the full 60-day post-completion grace period, and J-1 holders maintain their 30-day grace period. However, please note that this preliminary injunction is not a final ruling invalidating the rule , and a status conference is scheduled for October 2, 2026, to determine next steps in the litigation. Immediate Practice Tips: Inspect I-94 Travel Records Upon Reentry: F, J, and I visa holders currently admitted under D/S retain their status and should continue to be readmitted under D/S following international travel until the injunction is lifted. However, because the I-94 record controls legal stay, travelers must inspect their CBP-issued Form I-94 immediately upon reentry to confirm the "Admit Until Date" states "D/S" rather than a specific expiration date. If a specific date is mistakenly recorded, contact a local CPB Deferred Inspection Site. Notify HR and Review Workplace Compliance: Employers sponsoring F-1 or J-1 employees should inform HR and hiring managers that the September 15 fixed-period rule is postponed and standard D/S rules govern. This development does not alter standard filing windows or Form I-9 verification procedures for post-completion OPT or STEM OPT extensions.  Maintain Operational Readiness and Defer Unnecessary Filings: Visa holders and employers should defer travel or filing strategy decisions made solely in anticipation of the fixed-admission rule. Because DHS may appeal or the court could alter the timeline on short notice, institutions and visa holders should maintain readiness to adjust plans if implementation resumes. There are many evolving components to this litigation. If you are an F-1, J-1, or I visa holder, sponsoring institution, or employer, you should proactively coordinate with your international student office and legal counsel to protect your status and monitor upcoming court proceedings.
By Juliana LaMendola September 3, 2026
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published its final rule eliminating the longstanding "duration of status" (D/S) policy for F, J, and I visa holders, replacing it with a fixed period of admission effective September 15, 2026. This rule requires that those who need additional time to complete their programs must file Form I-539 with USCIS or travel abroad and seek to reenter to extend their authorized period of stay. F and J visa holders present in the U.S. and in valid status on September 15, 2026, will be allowed to remain in the United States until the Program End Date listed on their current Form I-20 (for F-1s) or Form DS-2019 (for J-1s), up to a maximum of four years (until September 15, 2030) plus a 60-day grace period for F-1s and a 30-day grace period for J-1s, without filing an Extension of Status request with USCIS. However, this safety net only applies while staying in the U.S.; international travel and subsequent reentry after September 15, 2026 will result in readmission under the new rule with an I-94 that expires on the Program End Date or Employment Authorization Document (EAD) expiration, but no later than four-years after their date of re-entry. Additionally, once re-admitted under the new rules, F-1s will only receive a 30-day grace period. Immediate Practice Tips: Any F-1 or J-1 nonimmigrant currently in the U.S. who plans to change programs, start a new degree level, or needs more time to complete their studies must work with their school or program sponsor to update their SEVIS record and receive an extended Form I-20 or DS-2019 before September 15, 2026. Eligible F-1 students should submit their post-completion OPT or STEM OPT work authorization applications (Form I-765) before September 15, 2026, to secure their status and drastically reduce the likelihood of needing a Form I-539 extension application. Any F-1 student who is eligible to apply for OPT or STEM OPT before March 18, 2027, should do so as soon as they are eligible to file their Form I-765. Since F-1s can file OPT applications up to 90 days in advance of graduation, F-1 students graduating before June 15,2027, should be able to file their OPT applications before March 18, 2027, and should do so to avoid also having to file Form I-539 to extend their stay. Thus, most F-1 students graduating in December 2026 and May/June 2027 should be able to take advantage of the transition rule’s delay in having to file Form I-539 applications and should only need to file Form I-765 to apply for OPT. Incoming F-1 and J-1 students who can enter the United States before the September 15, 2026 effective date (within the permissible 30-day window prior to their program start) should do so to benefit from the transition rules, including the full 60-day F-1 grace period and deferred extension requirements. Students (F-1 and J-1) who are planning international travel should return before the effective date if possible to preserve their transition benefits.  There are many parts of the rule that are not discussed here. If you are currently an F-1 or J-1 visa holder, you should proactively coordinate with your institutions and international office to protect your status and stay informed.
By Kris Quadros-Ragar August 27, 2026
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released updated policy guidance detailing how officers will evaluate "public charge" inadmissibility for individuals applying for green cards through adjustment of status. This update follows a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) final rule that rescinds the 2022 public charge regulations. The new policy takes effect on September 18, 2026 , and applies to all green card applications (Form I-485) postmarked or submitted on or after that date. Who Is Subject to the Public Charge Rule? Most family-based and employment-based green card applicants will be subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This includes spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents, as well as most employment visa preference categories, investors, and diversity visa applicants. Certain categories remain explicitly exempt under immigration law. These include: Asylees and refugees Victims of human trafficking (T visa) or crime (U visa) Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners Special Immigrant Juveniles Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Certain military-related applicants and other designated humanitarian groups How USCIS Will Make Determinations USCIS officers will evaluate whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge by reviewing the totality of their circumstances on a case-by-case basis. Key factors include: Five Statutory Factors: Age, health, family status, assets/financial resources, and education or skills. Affidavit of Support: Submission of Form I-864 executed by a sponsor. Use of Public Benefits: USCIS will look at means-tested public benefits, such as cash assistance for income maintenance, housing assistance, food stamps (SNAP), or college financial aid. Note on timing: For benefits received before September 18, 2026, USCIS will only consider public cash assistance for income maintenance and long-term institutionalization at government expense. For benefits received on or after September 18, 2026, the broader consideration of all listed means-tested benefits will apply. Public Charge Bonds If an officer determines that an applicant is inadmissible solely on public charge grounds, USCIS may issue a Notice of Intent to Deny that invites the applicant to post a public charge bond using Form I-945. If an invited applicant successfully posts the required cash or surety bond, USCIS may approve the application for permanent residence. Public charge bonds can only be submitted if explicitly invited by USCIS. Santos Lloyd Law Firm will continue to monitor immigration developments closely and provide updates as further implementation details are released. For more information, please access: https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/uscis-issues-guidance-on-making-public-charge-inadmissibility-determination
Show More