Get in touch
949-316-0078
info@santolloydlaw.com
What you need to know about removing conditions on your conditional green card through marriage
Denice Flores • March 2, 2023
🥳 Congratulations! You were granted a conditional green card through your marriage.
Your conditional resident status is only valid for 2 years. In order to prevent losing lawful status in the United States, you must submit Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence, 90 days before your conditional green card expires. It is critical that you file Form I-751 to remove the conditions in a timely manner because if it is not, you may risk being left without status and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security may issue you a Notice to Appear and place you in removal proceedings before an Immigration Judge.
When you file the removal of condition petition, if you are still married to the same U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident spouse, you may file Form I-751 with your U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, this is called “filing jointly.” The type of evidentiary documents that you submit should be documents to show that you and your spouse share joint finances and liabilities, and any other document to show you entered the marriage in good faith and continue to be a real marriage.
If you have separated or divorced from your U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, at the time of filing the removal of conditions, you can still file Form I-751 and request a waiver under the scenarios below. Keep in mind, regardless, you must prove that you entered the marriage in good faith.
- If the U.S. citizen or LPR spouse is deceased;
- If the marriage ended through divorce or annulment;
- If you were battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by your U.S. citizen or LPR spouse; or
- If termination of your resident status and removal from the U.S. would result in extreme hardship.
If you are requesting a waiver and are filing Form I-751 individually, submit evidentiary documents to prove that the marriage was entered in good faith and also evidence of abuse, divorce, or annulment, if applicable.
Please note, once you file Form I-751, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may require you to attend an interview to demonstrate your eligibility to remove the conditions on your residence.
If you have any questions, for example, about your specific case circumstances, the type of evidence to submit with Form I-751, and the interview process, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys and we will be more than happy to assist you.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
Denice Flores
Similar Posts
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish If you and your spouse were married for less than 2 years at the time of your I-485 ( Adjustment of Status ) interview and your application was approved, your lawful permanent resident status is conditional and a separate petition to remove those conditions (I-751 petition) must be filed within 90 days of the expiration date on your Green Card. An I-751 petition is a joint petition, filed by the Green Card holder and their spouse, that requests USCIS remove the conditions and issue you permanent resident status and a new 10-year Green Card. However, what if after filing the I-751 petition, you and your spouse decide to get divorced? In such situations, the Green Card holder can request a waiver of the joint petition filing requirement and submit this request with their I-751 petition. Even if you are requesting an I-751 waiver, you must still show that the marriage was originally entered into in good faith. This means that you will still need to prove to USCIS that you entered into the marriage for love and not just to obtain a Green Card. Evidence of good faith can include, but is not limited to, the marriage certificate, joint documents, birth certificates of children born of the marriage, etc. Documentation that can/should be submitted with your I-751 waiver request include copy of your green card, documentation regarding the circumstances surrounding the end of your marriage, evidence that the marriage was entered into in good faith, copy of the divorce decree (or evidence that divorce proceedings have been initiated if not yet final), statement from you regarding the circumstances, etc. USCIS reviews waiver requests on a case-by-case basis. Current USCIS policy guidance indicates that if a waiver request is made and the divorce is not yet final, USCIS should issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) with a response period of up to 87 days. In the RFE, the officer will request that you provide a copy of the final divorce decree and a statement from you officially asking that the I-751 petition be converted to a waiver application (if not already provided), along with any other documents they deem necessary to decide the case. As long as you can provide these documents to USCIS by the response deadline, the officer can amend the I-751 petition indicating that you are eligible for a waiver based on the termination of the marriage and can adjudicate the petition as such without the need to re-file the application. USCIS will then evaluate whether or not the good faith requirement has been met and may schedule the case for an in-person interview. If the application is approved, then you will be issued your 10-year Green Card. If the application is denied, then your case may be referred to immigration court and you may be placed in removal proceedings. I-751 waiver cases are a complicated matter. If you or someone you know find themselves in a situation like the one mentioned above, please contact our experienced immigration attorneys at Santos Lloyd Law Firm for assistance with your case.
On January 29, 2025, President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, significantly altering how immigration policies are enforced in the United States. This legislation grants State attorneys general and other authorized officials unprecedented authority to interpret and implement federal immigration policies. It also empowers them to take legal action against the federal government if they believe federal immigration enforcement negatively impacts their state. With this new authority, states now play a direct role in shaping immigration outcomes—a responsibility traditionally held by the federal government. One of the most immediate effects of the Laken Riley Act is that it allows states to seek injunctive relief to block the issuance of visas to nationals of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay the acceptance of their citizens who have been ordered removed from the United States . This means that if a country does not cooperate with U.S. deportation efforts, its nationals—regardless of their legal status—could face significant difficulties obtaining or renewing visas. As a result, foreign nationals from these countries may encounter increased uncertainty when traveling internationally or securing work authorization in the U.S. Beyond visa processing, the law introduces a new level of unpredictability into the immigration system. By allowing state attorneys general to intervene in federal procedures, and immigration policies that may now vary based on state-level decisions. In the coming months, it remains to be seen how individual states will wield this power—whether they will actively seek to block visa issuance or push for broader immigration enforcement measures. For foreign nationals and employers, staying informed about which countries are deemed “uncooperative” is now more important than ever. Those needing visa renewals or planning international travel should prepare for potential delays and seek professional guidance to navigate these uncertainties. The Laken Riley Act also mandates federal immigration authorities to detain and deport individuals without legal status who are charged with certain offenses, including minor theft or shoplifting, assaulting a law enforcement officer, and crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury. This provision underscores a stricter approach to immigration enforcement, affecting individuals accused of both minor and serious offenses. With immigration policies now subject to a new layer of state involvement, it is more important than ever to stay informed and prepared for potential challenges. If you have concerns about how the Laken Riley Act may affect your immigration status or business, contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for strategic counsel tailored to your needs.
On January 28, 2025, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem vacated the January 10, 2025, decision by former Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that had extended the 2023 designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuela and ordered that his January 17, 2025, notice re-designating Venezuela TPS be vacated. This action has understandably caused confusion and concern among Venezuelan TPS beneficiaries and those with pending applications. It is critical to clarify that this does not mean that the TPS program for Venezuela has been eliminated . Instead, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must now reconsider whether to re-designate (extend) or terminate the previous Venezuela TPS designations from 2021 and 2023. What Does the Vacatur Mean? Because the January 17, 2025, TPS extension was vacated, the most recent valid TPS designation for Venezuela remains the October 3, 2023, designation . The vacatur does not immediately affect TPS protections for individuals covered under the prior designations. However, DHS must make key decisions in the coming months: By February 1, 2025 , DHS must decide whether to extend or terminate the October 3, 2023, designation . By July 12, 2025 , DHS must decide whether to extend or terminate the March 9, 2021, designation . If the Secretary does not make a timely determination (for example, if the Secretary were not to make determination by February 1, 2025 whether to extend or terminate the 2023 Venezuela TPS designation), then the statute provides for an automatic extension of the designation for an additional period of 6 months . INA 244(b)(3)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(3)(C). Until these decisions are made, TPS remains in effect under the previous designations , and those who have already been granted TPS are not immediately impacted. Who Is Affected and What Should You Do? Current TPS Holders If you were already granted TPS under the March 9, 2021, or October 3, 2023, designations, your status remains valid. You must continue to comply with all re-registration requirements to maintain your protection and work authorization. Re-registration period: TPS beneficiaries under the 2021 and 2023 designations must re-register between January 17, 2025, and September 10, 2025 , to maintain their legal status and work authorization. Individuals with Pending TPS Applications as of January 17, 2025 If you applied for TPS before January 17, 2025 , under a previous designation, your application will continue to be processed . If your application is approved, your TPS protection will remain valid at least until April 2, 2025 . There is no need to reapply. Individuals Who Applied for TPS Between January 10, 2025, and January 28, 2025 If you applied for TPS during this period, USCIS will cease processing your applications and issue refunds of any fees paid in association with those applications . Additionally, USCIS will invalidate EADs; Forms 1-797, Notice of Action (Approval Notice); and Forms 1-94, Arrival/Departure Record (collectively known as TPS-related documentation) that have been issued with October 2, 2026 expiration dates under the January 17, 2025 Mayorkas Notice. What Happens Next? Given the Biden administration’s prior support for TPS, many expect DHS to extend or re-designate Venezuela for TPS rather than terminate it . However, no final decision has been made , and Venezuelan nationals with TPS or pending applications should continue to follow updates closely. What Should You Do Now? If you currently hold TPS , continue to comply with all TPS renewal requirements and remain aware of DHS’s upcoming decisions. If you have a pending application , check USCIS updates regularly and consult with an immigration attorney for the latest guidance.  If you applied between January 17, 2025, and January 28, 2025 , seek legal counsel to understand how the vacatur may affect your application. Stay Informed and Get Legal Guidance Our immigration firm is closely following these developments and will provide updates as soon as DHS makes its decision. If you have questions about your TPS status or how this memo affects your case, contact our office today for a consultation. For more information, refer to the official DHS notice on the vacatur: Vacatur of 2025 Temporary Protected Status Decision for Venezuela .
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," which aims to end birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States . This order specifically targets children born to mothers who are either unlawfully present or temporarily in the U.S. on visas, such as student, work, or tourist visas, if the father is neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident. Under this new policy, these children will no longer be granted automatic U.S. citizenship. The order is set to take effect 30 days from its signing and applies only to births occurring after that period, meaning it does not retroactively affect children born before the effective date. This executive order challenges the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born on American soil . The amendment states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." For over a century, this provision has been understood to grant citizenship to most individuals born in the U.S., regardless of their parents' immigration status. In response to the executive order, immigrant rights advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have filed lawsuits challenging its constitutionality . They argue that the order violates the clear mandate of the 14th Amendment and undermines fundamental American values. Legal experts anticipate that this issue will be contested in courts, with the potential for the order to be blocked or overturned. On January 23, 2025, a federal judge in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order (TRO), effectively blocking the executive order from taking effect for the next 14 days . The court cited potential constitutional violations and the need for further legal briefings before any enforcement could proceed. This ruling provides temporary relief to affected families and signals the likelihood of a prolonged legal battle. Further hearings are scheduled to determine whether the order will be permanently blocked or allowed to proceed. For families affected by this order, there is growing concern about the potential challenges their children may face without U.S. citizenship. Access to essential services, education, and employment opportunities could become more difficult for those impacted. However, it is important to remain hopeful, as the legal system provides checks and balances to ensure that any executive action aligns with constitutional principles. Historically, similar attempts to restrict birthright citizenship have faced significant legal challenges and have not been upheld . If you or someone you know may be impacted by this executive order, staying informed and understanding your rights is crucial. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our trusted immigration attorneys are available to provide guidance and support during this uncertain time, please contact us if you need assistance.
