Get in touch
949-316-0078
info@santolloydlaw.com
Centro Regional ou Investimento Direto para sua Petição EB-5?
Santos Lloyd Law Team • January 9, 2025
Click here to read this article in English
À medida que os efeitos do EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act de 2022 continuam a se desenvolver, essa categoria de visto de imigração tem visto uma popularidade crescente nos últimos meses. Antes de 2022, muitos indivíduos de alto patrimônio líquido evitavam totalmente a categoria EB-5, devido à incerteza generalizada em torno do programa. Não é segredo que a categoria EB-5 é cara, e quem poderia culpar um investidor por hesitar em destinar uma quantia tão significativa de capital em um meio de investimento com supervisão ou transparência limitadas? Com a grande maioria das preocupações sobre o programa tendo sido atenuada pelas disposições do EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act de 2022, que permitiram maior supervisão regulatória, aumentaram os limites de investimento, promoveram maior transparência e até removeram camadas de burocracia, os investidores estão mais uma vez ansiosos para participar deste programa altamente benéfico.
Se você está considerando um investimento financeiro significativo nos Estados Unidos, o programa EB-5 é uma excelente oportunidade não apenas para fazer o investimento, mas também para garantir a residência permanente e, eventualmente, a cidadania dos EUA em troca dessas contribuições. A ideia por trás do programa EB-5 é gerar estímulo econômico para os Estados Unidos, incluindo a criação de um número significativo de oportunidades de emprego para trabalhadores americanos. Os limites de investimento para os valores mínimos de investimento qualificáveis foram projetados com base no estímulo econômico suficiente gerado pelo capital investido. No entanto, com uma grande diferença entre os dois limites de investimento qualificáveis e uma ampla variedade de projetos potenciais para investir, muitos investidores ficam se perguntando qual caminho EB-5 é o mais adequado para eles.
De forma ampla, existem dois tipos de investimento EB-5: Investimento Direto ou Investimento por meio de um centro regional aprovado pelo USCIS. O melhor caminho para cada caso potencial depende das prioridades de cada indivíduo que está aplicando.
Para o investimento direto, a petição é apresentada com o formulário I-526, Petição de Imigrante por Investidor Individual. Um investidor que apresenta uma Petição de Investimento Direto EB-5 tem a oportunidade de investir em uma empresa responsável pela criação de pelo menos 10 empregos em tempo integral. Contanto que a organização possa verificar a criação real e a existência desses empregos, essas petições têm uma excelente chance de serem aprovadas. Essas petições podem ser particularmente benéficas para um investidor que acredita fortemente no sucesso de uma nova empresa ou conceito e deseja que a maior parte de seu investimento seja focada diretamente na empresa geradora de empregos.
Para um investimento em centro regional, a petição é apresentada com o formulário I-526E, Petição de Imigrante por Investidor de Centro Regional. Esses centros regionais são criados com o objetivo de facilitar o investimento EB-5. Cada centro regional deve se inscrever corretamente no USCIS e obter aprovação antes de serem listados pelo USCIS na lista de Centros Regionais de Investidores Imigrantes EB-5 Aprovados. Um dos principais benefícios de investir por meio de um centro regional é a facilitação do processo de aplicação, já que os centros regionais fornecerão uma parte substancial da documentação exigida. No entanto, isso também resulta em um nível mais baixo de controle sobre os fundos de investimento, em comparação com um investimento direto.
Para ambos os tipos de EB-5, o limite de investimento é determinado por fatores geográficos e econômicos dentro dos Estados Unidos. Como o programa foi projetado para estimular a economia dos EUA, há uma preferência geral por investimentos em áreas conhecidas como “Áreas de Emprego Alvo (TEAs)”. Essas são áreas rurais ou outras áreas designadas como tendo uma alta taxa de desemprego, definida como uma taxa de desemprego pelo menos 50% maior do que a média nacional dos EUA. O valor mínimo de investimento qualificado para uma Área de Emprego Alvo é de apenas US$ 900.000, em comparação com um limite mínimo de US$ 1,8 milhão para um investimento fora de uma TEA. Para aqueles investidores que são motivados principalmente pela obtenção de um green card, não há muito benefício em investir o dobro do capital em uma área fora de TEA. No entanto, para os investidores que estão confiantes em um determinado projeto de investimento e são motivados principalmente por retornos potenciais, pode valer a pena investir diretamente na organização com maior potencial, independentemente da localização geográfica nos EUA onde o investimento será focado.
Em última análise, a decisão sobre qual caminho EB-5 é melhor deve ser tomada por cada investidor individual e muda de caso para caso. No entanto, com uma quantia tão grande normalmente em jogo, todo investidor deseja ter confiança de que está escolhendo o melhor caminho para alcançar seus objetivos individuais. Se você está considerando seguir um investimento EB-5 e gostaria de discutir questões ou preocupações que possa ter sobre qual caminho EB-5 é o certo para você, encorajamos que agende uma consulta com um de nossos advogados experientes.
Este blog não se destina a fornecer aconselhamento jurídico e nada aqui deve ser interpretado como estabelecimento de um relacionamento advogado-cliente. Por favor, agende uma consulta com um advogado de imigração antes de agir com base em qualquer informação lida aqui.
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order imposing new restrictions on migrants, including limitations on asylum and humanitarian protections. The order directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to terminate all categorical parole programs that conflict with U.S. policies , which includes parole processes for Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan nationals. Additionally, this provision could impact parole programs for individuals from Afghanistan, Ukraine, and other countries. Beyond restricting parole, the executive order introduces several border security measures , including building more physical barriers, increasing the number of border personnel, and stopping the use of the CBP One mobile application . The order specifically directs the Department of Defense (DOD) and DHS to build more border walls to establish what it calls “complete operational control” of the southern border. Additionally, it ordered the immediate shutdown of the CBP One mobile app, which previously allowed asylum seekers to schedule appointments at U.S. Ports of Entry. As a result, all existing appointments have been canceled immediately . The order also initiates the reinstatement of the “Remain in Mexico” program , also known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) , across all sectors of the southern border. Under MPP, asylum seekers must remain in Mexico while awaiting the outcome of their U.S. immigration court proceedings, significantly altering the process for those seeking refuge in the country. These measures reinforce the Trump administration's broader effort to restrict asylum and humanitarian protections at the U.S. border . If you or someone you know may be affected by this executive order, it is essential to stay informed and understand your legal rights. Consulting with an immigration attorney can help navigate these evolving policies and ensure the best course of action moving forward.
The E-2 Visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows foreign investors from treaty countries to live and work in the United States by starting or purchasing a business. Unlike other visa categories, it does not require a fixed minimum investment amount. Instead, applicants must demonstrate that their investment is substantial and sufficient to ensure the success of their business. The visa is renewable indefinitely as long as the business remains active and meets the necessary criteria, making it an attractive option for entrepreneurs seeking long-term opportunities in the U.S. One of its key advantages is flexibility. Investors can establish a new business, acquire an existing one, or enter into franchise opportunities. Additionally, spouses and children under 21 can accompany the primary applicant, with spouses eligible to apply for work authorization. This makes the E-2 Visa a practical option for business-minded individuals looking to establish themselves in the U.S. market. While the E-2 Visa itself has remained a stable option, shifts in U.S. immigration policies have influenced the application process and overall investor experience. Understanding these changes is essential for anyone considering this pathway. Policy Shifts and the E-2 Visa: Lessons from the Past During the first Trump administration (2017–2021), U.S. immigration policies became more restrictive across multiple visa categories. Although the E-2 program was not directly limited, broader changes had an impact. The "Buy American, Hire American" Executive Order, signed in 2017, led to heightened scrutiny of visa applications, requiring investors to provide stronger evidence that their business would create jobs and contribute to the U.S. economy. This resulted in an increase in Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and denials for those unable to meet these expectations. Another significant change was the suspension of the Interview Waiver Program, which meant all E-2 applicants, including renewals, had to attend in-person interviews at U.S. embassies. This extended processing times and increased scrutiny of applications. Additionally, visa reciprocity agreements were reviewed and adjusted, impacting validity periods and costs for certain countries. For instance, Iranian citizens were deemed ineligible for the E-2 Visa due to the termination of the treaty. These adjustments significantly affected investors from impacted nations, increasing their costs and renewal frequency. Despite these policy shifts, the approval rate for E-2 visas remained relatively stable. According to data from the U.S. Department of State, there were over 43,000 approvals in 2019, reflecting the program’s continued viability. Even in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic caused global disruptions, approval numbers remained significant. These figures highlight that while the process became more rigorous, well-prepared investors continued to secure visas by demonstrating strong business plans, substantial investments, and clear economic contributions. What to Expect Moving Forward As the new Trump administration takes shape, further immigration policy changes are likely. While it is too soon to predict the exact impact on the E-2 Visa, past trends suggest increased scrutiny. However, the program itself has remained intact across multiple administrations, reinforcing its reliability for foreign entrepreneurs. Those considering this visa should stay informed and ensure their applications meet evolving requirements. A well-prepared investment strategy, clear documentation, and a defined job creation plan can make a significant difference in navigating any potential policy shifts. Why the E-2 Visa Remains a Strong Choice The E-2 Visa continues to be a resilient and valuable option for foreign entrepreneurs. Even during periods of policy change, approval rates have remained strong for investors with well-structured applications. The ability to renew indefinitely, combined with its flexibility in investment size and business type, makes it one of the most attractive pathways for international investors. With the right preparation, investors can confidently pursue the E-2 Visa, knowing that history has shown its stability even amid shifting political landscapes. By staying ahead of policy changes and ensuring a solid business strategy, entrepreneurs can take advantage of the opportunities the U.S. market has to offer. If you are ready to take the next step toward launching your business in the U.S., you can contact our office for expert guidance and personalized assistance with your application.
On January 29, 2025, President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, significantly altering how immigration policies are enforced in the United States. This legislation grants State attorneys general and other authorized officials unprecedented authority to interpret and implement federal immigration policies. It also empowers them to take legal action against the federal government if they believe federal immigration enforcement negatively impacts their state. With this new authority, states now play a direct role in shaping immigration outcomes—a responsibility traditionally held by the federal government. One of the most immediate effects of the Laken Riley Act is that it allows states to seek injunctive relief to block the issuance of visas to nationals of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay the acceptance of their citizens who have been ordered removed from the United States . This means that if a country does not cooperate with U.S. deportation efforts, its nationals—regardless of their legal status—could face significant difficulties obtaining or renewing visas. As a result, foreign nationals from these countries may encounter increased uncertainty when traveling internationally or securing work authorization in the U.S. Beyond visa processing, the law introduces a new level of unpredictability into the immigration system. By allowing state attorneys general to intervene in federal procedures, and immigration policies that may now vary based on state-level decisions. In the coming months, it remains to be seen how individual states will wield this power—whether they will actively seek to block visa issuance or push for broader immigration enforcement measures. For foreign nationals and employers, staying informed about which countries are deemed “uncooperative” is now more important than ever. Those needing visa renewals or planning international travel should prepare for potential delays and seek professional guidance to navigate these uncertainties. The Laken Riley Act also mandates federal immigration authorities to detain and deport individuals without legal status who are charged with certain offenses, including minor theft or shoplifting, assaulting a law enforcement officer, and crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury. This provision underscores a stricter approach to immigration enforcement, affecting individuals accused of both minor and serious offenses. With immigration policies now subject to a new layer of state involvement, it is more important than ever to stay informed and prepared for potential challenges. If you have concerns about how the Laken Riley Act may affect your immigration status or business, contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for strategic counsel tailored to your needs.
