Como evitar o abandono do status LPR

Angelica Rice • July 6, 2023

Click here to read this article in English

      Você esperou meses, talvez até anos, e finalmente recebeu seu Green Card e é um Residente Permanente Legal dos Estados Unidos, uhul!

     Agora você quer visitar a família no exterior, e então o COVID aconteceu, e sua mãe ficou doente, e depois de tudo isso, você só precisava de umas férias relaxantes em uma praia em Portugal, e o que era para ser uma viagem de 2 semanas se transformou em um estadia de 8 meses. Você corre o risco de os oficiais da patrulha de fronteira dos EUA pensarem que você abandonou seu status de Residente Permanente Legal (LPR)? Se sim, o que você faz? Como você pode passar um longo período fora dos Estados Unidos, sem abandonar seu status? Continue lendo para descobrir.


      Não há um período fixo de tempo que acione o abandono, mas os LPRs são tratados como candidatos à readmissão se estiverem ausentes dos Estados Unidos por um período contínuo superior a 180 dias. INA § 101(a)(13)(C)(ii). Embora um LPR retornando de uma visita de mais de 180 dias esteja sujeito aos motivos de inadmissibilidade e possa ser questionado quanto ao potencial abandono da residência, isso geralmente só ocorre quando o LPR está ausente há mais de um ano.

     Quando um LPR permanece no exterior continuamente por mais de um ano, presume-se que houve abandono. 8 CFR § 211.1(a)(2). Mas isso pode ser restaurado pela comprovação do LPR de que manteve laços suficientes com os Estados Unidos e nunca teve a intenção de abandonar a residência. Se você estimar que esteve fora dos Estados Unidos por mais de um (1) ano, é recomendável solicitar uma permissão de reentrada. Uma permissão de reentrada estabelece que você não pretendia abandonar seu status e permite solicitar a admissão nos Estados Unidos após viajar para o exterior por até 2 anos sem a necessidade de obter um visto de residente de retorno. Permissões de reentrada são normalmente válidas por 2 anos a partir da data de emissão. Para obter uma permissão de reentrada, preencha o Formulário I-131, Solicitação de Documento de Viagem. Se possível, você deve preencher esta solicitação com bastante antecedência da viagem planejada. Além disso, você não pode preencher um Formulário I-131 para obter uma permissão de reentrada, a menos que esteja fisicamente presente nos Estados Unidos quando preencher o formulário. Você também deve ter sua biometria tomada antes de deixar os Estados Unidos; a biometria não pode ser feita fora do país. No entanto, se você preencher o I-131 e completar sua biometria, poderá sair dos EUA enquanto o I-131 estiver pendente e, se/quando aprovado, o documento de viagem poderá ser enviado a uma embaixada dos EUA no exterior para você retirar no país estrangeiro. Você não precisa de uma permissão de reentrada se estiver fora dos EUA por menos de 1 ano.


    Se você não tiver uma permissão de reentrada para retornar aos Estados Unidos após um longo período fora, poderá argumentar que não abandonou seu status e apresentar evidências para apoiar seu argumento ao oficial de patrulha de fronteira no porto americano de entrada. Evidências para comprovar que você manteve seu status durante seu tempo ausente incluem, mas não se limitam a: prova de incapacidade médica; falecimento de um familiar; pagamentos de hipotecas de uma casa nos Estados Unidos; emprego em uma empresa americana no exterior; uma carteira de motorista emitida no ano anterior e comprovando o mesmo endereço registrado no Formulário I-94, Registro de Chegada e Partida; o nome e endereço do empregador nos EUA e evidência de que um salário foi pago dentro de um período de tempo razoável; evidência de matrícula de crianças em uma escola dos EUA; prova de que a permanência prolongada no exterior foi causada por circunstâncias imprevistas; comprovação de data predeterminada de término da viagem, como formatura ou término de contrato de trabalho; evidência de ter preenchido declarações de imposto de renda nos EUA no(s) ano(s) anterior(es); e evidência de propriedade, seja imóvel ou móvel, nos Estados Unidos. 9 FAM 42.22 N. 1.3.


      Se você não tem certeza se abandonou seu status de LPR ou deseja aconselhamento sobre viagens prolongadas fora dos Estados Unidos,por favor, contate um de nossos advogados de imigração altamente experientes hoje mesmo!

Este blog não se destina a fornecer aconselhamento jurídico e nada aqui deve ser interpretado como estabelecimento de um relacionamento advogado-cliente. Por favor, agende uma consulta com um advogado de imigração antes de agir com base em qualquer informação lida aqui.

By Kris Quadros-Ragar February 6, 2025
On January 29, 2025, President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, significantly altering how immigration policies are enforced in the United States. This legislation grants State attorneys general and other authorized officials unprecedented authority to interpret and implement federal immigration policies. It also empowers them to take legal action against the federal government if they believe federal immigration enforcement negatively impacts their state. With this new authority, states now play a direct role in shaping immigration outcomes—a responsibility traditionally held by the federal government. One of the most immediate effects of the Laken Riley Act is that it allows states to seek injunctive relief to block the issuance of visas to nationals of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay the acceptance of their citizens who have been ordered removed from the United States . This means that if a country does not cooperate with U.S. deportation efforts, its nationals—regardless of their legal status—could face significant difficulties obtaining or renewing visas. As a result, foreign nationals from these countries may encounter increased uncertainty when traveling internationally or securing work authorization in the U.S. Beyond visa processing, the law introduces a new level of unpredictability into the immigration system. By allowing state attorneys general to intervene in federal procedures, and immigration policies that may now vary based on state-level decisions. In the coming months, it remains to be seen how individual states will wield this power—whether they will actively seek to block visa issuance or push for broader immigration enforcement measures. For foreign nationals and employers, staying informed about which countries are deemed “uncooperative” is now more important than ever. Those needing visa renewals or planning international travel should prepare for potential delays and seek professional guidance to navigate these uncertainties. The Laken Riley Act also mandates federal immigration authorities to detain and deport individuals without legal status who are charged with certain offenses, including minor theft or shoplifting, assaulting a law enforcement officer, and crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury. This provision underscores a stricter approach to immigration enforcement, affecting individuals accused of both minor and serious offenses. With immigration policies now subject to a new layer of state involvement, it is more important than ever to stay informed and prepared for potential challenges. If you have concerns about how the Laken Riley Act may affect your immigration status or business, contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for strategic counsel tailored to your needs.
By Angelica Rice January 31, 2025
On January 28, 2025, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem vacated the January 10, 2025, decision by former Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that had extended the 2023 designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuela and ordered that his January 17, 2025, notice re-designating Venezuela TPS be vacated. This action has understandably caused confusion and concern among Venezuelan TPS beneficiaries and those with pending applications. It is critical to clarify that this does not mean that the TPS program for Venezuela has been eliminated . Instead, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must now reconsider whether to re-designate (extend) or terminate the previous Venezuela TPS designations from 2021 and 2023. What Does the Vacatur Mean? Because the January 17, 2025, TPS extension was vacated, the most recent valid TPS designation for Venezuela remains the October 3, 2023, designation . The vacatur does not immediately affect TPS protections for individuals covered under the prior designations. However, DHS must make key decisions in the coming months: By February 1, 2025 , DHS must decide whether to extend or terminate the October 3, 2023, designation . By July 12, 2025 , DHS must decide whether to extend or terminate the March 9, 2021, designation . If the Secretary does not make a timely determination (for example, if the Secretary were not to make determination by February 1, 2025 whether to extend or terminate the 2023 Venezuela TPS designation), then the statute provides for an automatic extension of the designation for an additional period of 6 months . INA 244(b)(3)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(3)(C). Until these decisions are made, TPS remains in effect under the previous designations , and those who have already been granted TPS are not immediately impacted. Who Is Affected and What Should You Do? Current TPS Holders If you were already granted TPS under the March 9, 2021, or October 3, 2023, designations, your status remains valid. You must continue to comply with all re-registration requirements to maintain your protection and work authorization. Re-registration period: TPS beneficiaries under the 2021 and 2023 designations must re-register between January 17, 2025, and September 10, 2025 , to maintain their legal status and work authorization. Individuals with Pending TPS Applications as of January 17, 2025 If you applied for TPS before January 17, 2025 , under a previous designation, your application will continue to be processed . If your application is approved, your TPS protection will remain valid at least until April 2, 2025 . There is no need to reapply. Individuals Who Applied for TPS Between January 10, 2025, and January 28, 2025 If you applied for TPS during this period, USCIS will cease processing your applications and issue refunds of any fees paid in association with those applications . Additionally, USCIS will invalidate EADs; Forms 1-797, Notice of Action (Approval Notice); and Forms 1-94, Arrival/Departure Record (collectively known as TPS-related documentation) that have been issued with October 2, 2026 expiration dates under the January 17, 2025 Mayorkas Notice. What Happens Next? Given the Biden administration’s prior support for TPS, many expect DHS to extend or re-designate Venezuela for TPS rather than terminate it . However, no final decision has been made , and Venezuelan nationals with TPS or pending applications should continue to follow updates closely. What Should You Do Now? If you currently hold TPS , continue to comply with all TPS renewal requirements and remain aware of DHS’s upcoming decisions. If you have a pending application , check USCIS updates regularly and consult with an immigration attorney for the latest guidance.  If you applied between January 17, 2025, and January 28, 2025 , seek legal counsel to understand how the vacatur may affect your application. Stay Informed and Get Legal Guidance Our immigration firm is closely following these developments and will provide updates as soon as DHS makes its decision. If you have questions about your TPS status or how this memo affects your case, contact our office today for a consultation. For more information, refer to the official DHS notice on the vacatur: Vacatur of 2025 Temporary Protected Status Decision for Venezuela .
By Angelica Rice January 23, 2025
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," which aims to end birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States . This order specifically targets children born to mothers who are either unlawfully present or temporarily in the U.S. on visas, such as student, work, or tourist visas, if the father is neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident. Under this new policy, these children will no longer be granted automatic U.S. citizenship. The order is set to take effect 30 days from its signing and applies only to births occurring after that period, meaning it does not retroactively affect children born before the effective date. This executive order challenges the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born on American soil . The amendment states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." For over a century, this provision has been understood to grant citizenship to most individuals born in the U.S., regardless of their parents' immigration status. In response to the executive order, immigrant rights advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have filed lawsuits challenging its constitutionality . They argue that the order violates the clear mandate of the 14th Amendment and undermines fundamental American values. Legal experts anticipate that this issue will be contested in courts, with the potential for the order to be blocked or overturned. On January 23, 2025, a federal judge in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order (TRO), effectively blocking the executive order from taking effect for the next 14 days . The court cited potential constitutional violations and the need for further legal briefings before any enforcement could proceed. This ruling provides temporary relief to affected families and signals the likelihood of a prolonged legal battle. Further hearings are scheduled to determine whether the order will be permanently blocked or allowed to proceed. For families affected by this order, there is growing concern about the potential challenges their children may face without U.S. citizenship. Access to essential services, education, and employment opportunities could become more difficult for those impacted. However, it is important to remain hopeful, as the legal system provides checks and balances to ensure that any executive action aligns with constitutional principles. Historically, similar attempts to restrict birthright citizenship have faced significant legal challenges and have not been upheld . If you or someone you know may be impacted by this executive order, staying informed and understanding your rights is crucial. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our trusted immigration attorneys are available to provide guidance and support during this uncertain time, please contact us if you need assistance.
Show More
Share by:
WhatsApp Live Chat
WhatsApp Logo

Contact Us

×
Hello! How can we help you?