Unlocking US Business Opportunities: A Guide to Non-Immigrant Visa Options for Entrepreneurs
Flavia Santos Lloyd • July 6, 2023
Entrepreneurs and investors are key drivers of economic growth and job creation, and the United States has long been a destination of choice for those seeking to start or grow their businesses. However, navigating the U.S. immigration system can be complex and time-consuming. In this article, we will discuss the various non-immigrant visa options available to entrepreneurs and investors looking to enter the United States.
L-1 Intracompany Transferee Visa
The L-1 Intracompany Transferee Visa is a visa category specifically designed for executives, managers, and employees possessing specialized knowledge who are relocating from a foreign corporation to a U.S. affiliate. The eligibility for an L-1 visa requires the foreign corporation and the U.S. affiliate to be connected through common ownership or control. Transferees must also demonstrate that they have been employed abroad for at least 12 months in an executive, managerial, and specialized knowledge capacity.
An employee being relocated might also be heading to the United States to set up an office if the company doesn't have an existing presence there. The L-1 visa isn't the best choice for someone in the early stages of launching a company, particularly if the business is being established in the United States. However, it could be a viable option for an entrepreneur who has, for instance, kick-started a business outside of the United States which will maintain its operations, or if the entrepreneur merges operations with a foreign company where they have previously been employed.
E-1 Treaty Trader Visa
E-1 Treaty Trader
Visa category is designated for nationals of countries with which the U.S. maintains treaties of commerce and navigation. An entrepreneur qualifying for an E-1 visa must be entering the U.S. to carry out substantial trade, including trade in services or technology, principally between the U.S. and the treaty country.
Trade, as defined, must involve an exchange of goods, money, or services. Virtually any goods or services can meet this requirement. The transaction flow between the two countries should be verifiable, typically done through documents such as purchase orders, wire transfers, or bills of lading.
To determine the substantiality of the trade, the Department of State (DOS) will assess the frequency and monetary value of the transactions. More regular, high-value transactions are given greater consideration. However, smaller businesses can also qualify if they can demonstrate that the transaction volume is sufficient to support the treaty trader(s) and their family.
The DOS applies a general rule stating that at least 50% of the trade must be between the United States and the treaty country. Thus, applicants should provide evidence of their total business transactions and proof that a minimum of 50% is between the two countries. The remaining trade can be domestic or international with other countries. Even if a US-based subsidiary meets the 50% requirement, the parent company abroad does not necessarily need to conduct 50% of its trade with the United States.
Due to the requirement of demonstrating substantial trade history, it may be challenging for early-stage startups to qualify for an E-1. This visa type is more frequently used by established entrepreneurs with a foreign business and a US customer base, who wish to continue their operations in the US. In some instances, foreign firms aiming to penetrate the US market may use an E-1 for a newly established US subsidiary and start moving inventory for sale in the US. In this case, all trade may be between the foreign parent and US subsidiary, thereby comfortably meeting the 50% threshold.
E-2 Treaty Investor Visa
E-2 Treaty Investor
Visa is for citizens of countries that have a treaty of commerce and navigation with the United States. To qualify for an E-2 visa, an entrepreneur must be coming to the United States to develop and direct the operations of a business in which they have invested, or are in the process of investing, a substantial amount of capital.
In the classic example of an E-2 investment, the E-2 investor transfers their personal wealth from a foreign bank account into the bank account of their new US enterprise, thereby establishing their investment. However, the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) provides some flexibility, enabling the officer to consider other "arrangements" as an "investment."
For those not intending to finance the E-2 enterprise entirely or partially with their personal funds, the nationality of other investors needs to be considered to ensure that at least 50% of the company shares remain in the hands of nationals from the E-2 treaty country. For instance, suppose one co-founder is American and the other is French, and they each own 50% of the company, contributing $40,000 from their personal wealth as initial capital for the company. To raise additional funds, they each decide to swap 7% of their equity (14% in total) with an angel investor for $150,000. If the angel investor is also French, then 57% of the company is now owned by French nationals; but if the angel is a U.S. citizen, then only 43% of the company is French, and it no longer qualifies as a French company for E-2 purposes. In this scenario, the founders will need to switch to another visa type before the equity exchange, as their E-2 will no longer be valid when the company loses its treaty nationality.
A central concern for every E-2 application is the "source of funds." The applicant must clearly demonstrate the lawful origin of their investment funds, along with evidence of ownership and control. Moreover, to be classified as an E-2 investment, the invested assets or funds must be "at risk." This means that if the business fails, the investment is proportionately lost. Though the investment capital may be loan-based, the loan cannot be secured against the assets of the E-2 enterprise. Personal loans, which may be secured by personal assets like a second mortgage or unsecured loans typically obtained from family, friends, or business partners, are permissible.
O-1 Visa
The O-1 visa category is a unique and advantageous option for startup entrepreneurs and business owners who have demonstrated exceptional prowess in their field. The O-1A visa variant specifically caters to individuals exhibiting extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. This makes it a viable avenue for those looking to establish or expand their business ventures in the US without the necessity of maintaining an overseas office or providing evidence of trade and investment, as required by L-1 and E-1/E-2 visas.
Unlike the more traditional visa categories, the O-1A visa shifts the emphasis onto the beneficiary's individual achievements within their domain. It demands that the beneficiary meets at least three of the eight regulatory criteria set forth by the US Immigration Services. These criteria form a comprehensive measure of the individual's accomplishments, recognition, and overall standing in their respective field.
For instance, if the beneficiary has been the recipient of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards, it highlights their excellence and industry-leading competence. Alternatively, membership in prestigious associations which require commendable achievements as judged by recognized experts can also serve as evidence of their extraordinary ability.
The O-1 visa offers an alternate route that places an emphasis on individual expertise and recognition in the applicant's field, rather than specific trade or investment quotas. This visa is especially beneficial for those who have demonstrated exceptional capability and achieved a high degree of success in their respective business domain.
Overall, the O-1A visa offers an effective immigration route for extraordinarily talented entrepreneurs and business owners. By meeting and surpassing the eligibility criteria, they can gain access to the vast opportunities in the US market, thereby furthering their business ventures and contributing to the economic growth and diversification of the US.
Conclusion
For foreign entrepreneurs and investors, several U.S. immigration options are available: the E-1 treaty trader visa, the E-2 treaty investor visa, the L-1 intra-company transferee visa, and the O-1 visa for individuals with extraordinary ability. While E-1 and E-2 visas center on trade and investment respectively, the L-1 is for managers or executives transferring to a U.S. branch of their company, and the O-1 visa acknowledges individual expertise and accomplishments. Each visa has unique prerequisites, necessitating the guidance of an immigration attorney for optimal strategy selection. Correct navigation of these options opens vast U.S. entrepreneurial opportunities and resources.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
Flavia Lloyd
Similar Posts
In years past, spouses of certain E and L visa categories were required to apply for and receive an Employment Authorization Document in order to work in the United States. However, as the result of a settlement reached by USCIS in the class action lawsuit Shergill v. Mayorkas on November 10, 2021, USCIS now considers E and L dependent spouses to be authorized for employment incident to their status.
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
Family-based immigration remains one of the most common paths to lawful permanent residency in the United States. It offers a lifeline to families hoping to reunite across borders, but the process is far from simple. The outcome of the applications can be delayed as a result of potential missteps while preparing the applications. Here are some of the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them: Incomplete or Inaccurate Forms One frequent mistake is submitting incomplete or inaccurate information on the forms like the I-130 (Petition for Alien Relative) and the I-485 (Adjustment of Status). Even minor errors such as misspelled names, missing signatures, or incorrect dates—can result in Requests for Evidence. To avoid this misstep, double-check all entries, cross-reference documents, and consult with an attorney before submission. Remember, immigration forms are legal documents so accuracy matters. Insufficient Supporting Evidence Proving a genuine familial relationship is the basis of family-based petitions. For spousal cases, USCIS looks closely at evidence of a bona fide marriage. Little or no supporting documents and evidence may lead to Requests for Evidence and even skepticism from USCIS. To establish a bona fide marriage, include documentation to show shared finances and liabilities. Filing Under the Wrong Category or Preference There are different immigration paths depending on whether the petitioner is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, and whether the beneficiary is a spouse, child, sibling, or parent. Each category has different processing times and visa availability. It is critical that before applying, you understand which preference category applies to your case. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (spouses, parents, unmarried children under 21) generally receive faster processing and are not subject to annual visa caps. Not Disclosing Past Immigration or Criminal History Many applicants fail to account for past immigration violations such as visa overstays, unauthorized work, or prior removal orders. Similarly, if you fail to disclose past criminal history and these issues surface later in the process they can affect the outcome of the case. Disclose everything to your attorney, no matter how minor or old the issue seems. Prior violations don’t always mean denial but not disclosing them may lead to serious consequences. If you're considering filing a family-based petition, consult with an experienced immigration attorney at our office. Our office is committed to helping families navigate this complex process with clarity and confidence.
When applying for a green card or seeking admission into the United States, one of the legal hurdles many applicants may face is the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This test evaluates whether someone is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support. But what exactly does that mean—and what types of public benefits can trigger this issue? In this article, we’ll break down what “public charge” really means, who is affected, what types of public benefits are considered, and what immigrants should be mindful of when making decisions about public programs like Medi-Cal and Medicaid. What Is the Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility? The public charge rule applies to individuals applying for a visa, green card (adjustment of status), or entry into the U.S., unless they fall into an exempt category. Under this rule, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must determine whether the applicant is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. This typically refers to receiving: Public cash assistance for income maintenance (such as SSI or TANF), or Long-term institutional care at government expense. This determination is based on the "totality of circumstances," including age, health, financial resources, education, skills, and whether a sponsor has submitted a valid Affidavit of Support. Who Is Exempt from the Public Charge Rule? Many categories of immigrants are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. These include: Asylees and refugees Special immigrant juveniles Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners T and U visa applicants Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Importantly, even if someone later adjusts status through a different pathway that is subject to public charge, any benefits they received while in an exempt category will not be held against them. What Public Benefits Are Not Considered in the Public Charge Test? It is a common and harmful myth that using any public benefit will jeopardize your immigration status. In fact, most non-cash benefits do not count against you in a public charge determination. According to USCIS and DHS guidance, the following types of assistance (current as of July 1, 2025) are not considered: Health-Related Benefits Medi-Cal/Medicaid, except for long-term institutional care Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Health insurance through the ACA Marketplace, including subsidies COVID-19 testing, vaccines, and treatment Community health services, crisis counseling, and short-term shelters Food and Nutrition SNAP (Food Stamps) WIC School meal programs Food banks and emergency food assistance Housing and Energy Emergency shelter Rental assistance (e.g., McKinney-Vento programs) Energy assistance (e.g., LIHEAP) Education and Childcare Public schooling Head Start Childcare subsidies (e.g., CCDF) Educational grants and scholarships Federal Cash and Tax Benefits Earned income tax credit (EITC) Child Tax Credit (CTC) Stimulus checks Unemployment insurance Social Security and veteran’s benefits Disaster and pandemic-related cash aid In short, just because a benefit is public or government-funded doesn’t automatically make it count against you. A Word of Caution About Medi-Cal and Medicaid, in Particular As of today (07/01/2025), standard use of Medi-Cal (California’s version of Medicaid) or Medicaid for most health-related services is not considered in a public charge determination. This includes preventative care, emergency services, pregnancy-related services, and short-term care. However, if Medicaid is used for long-term institutionalization, such as in a nursing home or psychiatric facility, that does count under the public charge test. Despite current guidance, we are seeing political shifts and changes in tone from the current administration that suggest public charge policies may become more restrictive in the future. This includes renewed interest in expanding the types of public benefits that may be considered, particularly around medical assistance. For that reason, we generally recommend that individuals who are applying for adjustment of status, or who may be subject to the public charge ground in the future, avoid enrolling in Medi-Cal or Medicaid at this time, unless absolutely necessary. Final Thoughts Immigration law is complex, and the rules surrounding public charge can feel confusing or even frightening. But it’s important to understand that using most public benefits—especially for food, education, and healthcare—will not automatically jeopardize your green card or visa application. Still, because policy can change quickly, we urge individuals to consult with an immigration attorney before applying for any public assistance—especially healthcare programs like Medi-Cal or Medicaid. If you have questions or concerns about how public benefits might impact your immigration case, our office is here to help. We are committed to providing up-to-date, personalized guidance to keep your immigration journey on track. Disclaimer The information provided herein is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every immigration case is unique, and the application of the public charge rule may vary depending on your specific situation. If you believe this topic may apply to you or you need individualized legal guidance, we encourage you to contact one of our highly-qualified legal professionals for a consultation and assistance tailored to your circumstances. Resources: USCIS Public Charge Resources ILRC Medi-Cal and Public Charge Alert (2024) California Medi-Cal Immigrant Eligibility FAQ
As an immigration law firm, we regularly assist highly skilled professionals working in the U.S. on temporary work visas such as H-1B who are seeking a path to permanent residency. For many of these individuals, the EB-2 and EB-3 employment-based green card categories are the most pursued—and frequently misunderstood—routes . While both are viable pathways to permanent residency, they differ in meaningful ways that can significantly impact the timing, eligibility, and overall strategy of your case. The EB-2 category is intended for individuals who either hold an advanced degree or demonstrate exceptional ability in their field . Most applicants qualify by having a master’s degree (or higher), or a bachelor’s degree accompanied by at least five years of progressive experience in their profession. There is also a subcategory within EB-2 known as the National Interest Waiver (NIW), which allows qualified individuals to self-petition without employer sponsorship if their work substantially benefits the United States. This route is especially relevant for researchers, entrepreneurs, and professionals in high national interest or mission-critical fields. In contrast, the EB-3 category includes professionals with a bachelor’s degree as well as skilled workers with at least two years of training or experience . While the educational threshold for EB-3 may appear less rigorous, the process itself is equally structured. One key distinction between EB-2 and EB-3 lies in the requirements of the job being offered, not just the applicant’s own credentials. For example, if a position requires only a bachelor’s degree, even a highly qualified candidate with a master’s degree may still fall under EB-3. Regardless of which category applies, most employment-based green card cases begin with the PERM labor certification process . This is a formal procedure overseen by the U.S. Department of Labor, in which the employer must test the labor market and demonstrate that there are no able, willing, qualified, and available U.S. workers for the position. The employer must also agree to pay the prevailing wage as determined by the Department of Labor. This step is both mandatory and highly detail-sensitive; inaccuracies in the job description, recruitment steps, or wage determination can lead to significant delays or even denials. Once PERM certification is approved, the employer files Form I-140 , the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. This petition confirms that the employee meets the requirements for the offered position under either EB-2 or EB-3, and that the employer is financially capable of providing the job as described. If the employee’s priority date—which is based on the date the PERM was filed—is current according to the Department of State’s Visa Bulletin, the individual may then file Form I-485 to adjust their status to lawful permanent resident. One of the more nuanced aspects of this process involves understanding how priority dates and visa backlogs affect the timeline. For applicants from countries with high demand, such as India or China, significant delays are common—particularly under EB-2. Paradoxically, there are times when the EB-3 category moves faster, prompting some applicants to file a second I-140 under EB-3 while retaining the original priority date. This strategy can be effective but requires careful legal planning to ensure it’s done correctly. Another strategic factor is portability. If your I-485 application has been pending for at least 180 days and your I-140 has been approved, you may be eligible to change employers under the AC21 portability provisions, so long as the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification. This flexibility can be critical for employees who experience job changes or promotions during the often lengthy green card process. Ultimately, the choice between EB-2 and EB-3 isn’t about prestige —it’s about aligning your qualifications, the job requirements, and your immigration history with current legal standards and market conditions. The right strategy depends not only on your education and experience, but also on your long-term career goals and country of origin. At our firm, we work closely with both employers and employees to develop individualized immigration strategies that streamline the process and avoid unnecessary setbacks. Whether you're a corporate professional evaluating your green card options or an employer preparing to sponsor a key team member, we offer the insight and experience to move your case forward with confidence.
