Desbloqueando oportunidades de negócios nos EUA: um guia para opções de visto de não-imigrante para empreendedores

Flavia Santos • July 14, 2023

Click here to read this article in English

      Empreendedores e investidores são impulsionadores-chave do crescimento econômico e da criação de empregos, e os Estados Unidos têm sido há muito tempo um destino de escolha para aqueles que desejam iniciar ou expandir seus negócios. No entanto, navegar pelo sistema de imigração dos EUA pode ser complexo e demorado. Neste artigo, discutiremos as várias opções de visto de não-imigrante disponíveis para empreendedores e investidores que desejam ingressar nos Estados Unidos.

Visto L-1 para transferidos da mesma empresa – “L-1 Intracompany Transferee Visa”

Esta é uma categoria de visto especificamente projetada para executivos, gerentes e funcionários com conhecimento especializado que estão se mudando de uma corporação estrangeira para uma filial nos Estados Unidos. A elegibilidade para um visto L-1 requer que a corporação estrangeira e a filial nos EUA estejam conectadas por meio de propriedade ou controle comum. Os transferidos também devem demonstrar que foram empregados no exterior por pelo menos 12 meses em uma capacidade executiva, gerencial e de conhecimento especializado.

Um funcionário que está sendo transferido também pode estar se dirigindo aos Estados Unidos para abrir um escritório se a empresa não tiver presença lá. O visto L-1 não é a melhor escolha para alguém nos estágios iniciais de lançamento de uma empresa, especialmente se o negócio estiver sendo estabelecido nos Estados Unidos. No entanto, pode ser uma opção viável para um empreendedor que tenha, por exemplo, iniciado um negócio fora dos Estados Unidos que manterá suas operações, ou se o empreendedor fundir as operações com uma empresa estrangeira onde ele tenha sido empregado anteriormente. 

Visto E-1 Tratado de Comerciante – “E-1 Treaty Trader Visa”

Esta categoria de visto é designada para cidadãos de países com os quais os Estados Unidos mantêm tratados de comércio e navegação. Um empreendedor que se qualifica para um visto E-1 deve entrar nos EUA para realizar comércio substancial, incluindo comércio de serviços ou tecnologia, principalmente entre os EUA e o país do tratado.

O comércio, conforme definido, deve envolver a troca de mercadorias, dinheiro ou serviços. Praticamente qualquer mercadoria ou serviço pode atender a esse requisito. O fluxo de transações entre os dois países deve ser verificável, geralmente por meio de documentos como ordens de compra, transferências bancárias ou conhecimentos de embarque.

Para determinar a substancialidade do comércio, o Departamento de Estado (DOS) avaliará a frequência e o valor monetário das transações. Transações mais regulares e de alto valor recebem maior consideração. No entanto, pequenas empresas também podem se qualificar se puderem demonstrar que o volume de transações é suficiente para sustentar o(s) comerciante(s) do tratado e sua família.

O DOS aplica uma regra geral que estabelece que pelo menos 50% do comércio deve ser entre os Estados Unidos Assim, os candidatos devem fornecer provas de suas transações comerciais totais e provar que um mínimo de 50% é entre os dois países. O comércio restante pode ser doméstico ou internacional com outros países. Mesmo que uma subsidiária com sede nos Estados Unidos atenda ao requisito de 50%, a matriz no exterior não precisa necessariamente conduzir 50% de seu comércio com os Estados Unidos.

Devido à exigência de demonstrar um histórico comercial substancial, pode ser um desafio para as startups em estágio inicial se qualificarem para um E-1. Este tipo de visto é mais utilizado por empresários estabelecidos com negócios no exterior e uma base de clientes nos Estados Unidos, que desejam continuar suas operações nos Estados Unidos. Em alguns casos, empresas estrangeiras com o objetivo de penetrar no mercado dos EUA podem usar um E-1 para uma subsidiária americana recém-estabelecida e começar a mover estoque para venda nos EUA. Nesse caso, todo o comércio pode ser feito entre a controladora estrangeira e a subsidiária americana, atingindo assim confortavelmente o limite de 50%.

Visto E-2 Tratado de Investidor – “E-2 Treaty Investor Visa”

O Visto de Investidor do Tratado E-2 é para cidadãos de países que possuem um tratado de comércio e navegação com os Estados Unidos. Para se qualificar para um visto E-2, um empresário deve vir para os Estados Unidos para desenvolver e dirigir as operações de um negócio no qual investiu ou está investindo uma quantia substancial de capital.

No exemplo clássico de um investimento E-2, o investidor E-2 transfere sua riqueza pessoal de uma conta bancária estrangeira para a conta bancária de sua nova empresa nos Estados Unidos, estabelecendo assim seu investimento. No entanto, o Manual de Relações Exteriores (FAM) oferece alguma flexibilidade, permitindo que o oficial considere outros "arranjos" como um "investimento".

Para aqueles que não pretendem financiar o empreendimento E-2 total ou parcialmente com seus recursos pessoais, a nacionalidade de outros investidores precisa ser considerada para garantir que pelo menos 50% das ações da empresa permaneçam nas mãos de nacionais do E-2 país tratado. Por exemplo, suponha que um dos cofundadores seja americano e o outro francês, e cada um possua 50% da empresa, contribuindo com US$ 40.000 de sua fortuna pessoal como capital inicial para a empresa. Para levantar fundos adicionais, cada um deles decide trocar 7% de seu patrimônio (14% no total) com um investidor anjo por $ 150.000. Se o investidor-anjo também for francês, então 57% da empresa passa a ser de propriedade de cidadãos franceses; mas se o anjo for um cidadão americano, então apenas 43% da empresa é francesa e não se qualifica mais como uma empresa francesa para fins de E-2. Neste cenário, os fundadores precisarão mudar para outro tipo de visto antes da troca de ações, pois o E-2 não será mais válido quando a empresa perder sua nacionalidade de tratado.

Uma preocupação central para cada aplicação do visto E-2 é a "fonte de fundos". O requerente deve demonstrar claramente a origem legal de seus fundos de investimento, juntamente com evidências de propriedade e controle. Além disso, para ser classificado como um investimento E-2, os ativos ou fundos investidos devem estar "em risco". Isso significa que, se o negócio falhar, o investimento é proporcionalmente perdido. Embora o capital de investimento possa ser baseado em empréstimo, o empréstimo não pode ser garantido pelos ativos da empresa E-2. Empréstimos pessoais, que podem ser garantidos por bens pessoais como uma segunda hipoteca ou empréstimos não garantidos normalmente obtidos de familiares, amigos ou parceiros de negócios, são permitidos. 

Visto O-1 

A categoria de visto O-1 é uma opção única e vantajosa para empreendedores iniciantes e proprietários de empresas que demonstraram proezas excepcionais em seu campo. A categoria de visto O-1A atende especificamente a indivíduos que exibem habilidades extraordinárias em ciências, educação, negócios ou atletismo. Isso o torna um caminho viável para aqueles que procuram estabelecer ou expandir seus negócios nos EUA sem a necessidade de manter um escritório no exterior ou fornecer evidências de comércio e investimento, conforme exigido pelos vistos L-1 e E-1/E-2. 

Ao contrário das categorias de visto mais tradicionais, o visto O-1A muda a ênfase para as realizações individuais do beneficiário dentro de seu domínio. Exige que o beneficiário atenda a pelo menos três dos oito critérios regulatórios estabelecidos pelos Serviços de Imigração dos EUA. Esses critérios formam uma medida abrangente das realizações, reconhecimento e posição geral do indivíduo em seus respectivos campos.

Por exemplo, se o beneficiário recebeu prêmios ou prêmios reconhecidos nacional ou internacionalmente, isso destaca sua excelência e competência líder do setor. Alternativamente, a participação em associações de prestígio que exigem conquistas louváveis, conforme julgado por especialistas reconhecidos, também pode servir como evidência de sua habilidade extraordinária.

O visto O-1 oferece uma rota alternativa que enfatiza a experiência individual e o reconhecimento no campo do solicitante, em vez de cotas comerciais ou de investimento. Este visto é especialmente benéfico para aqueles que demonstraram capacidade excepcional e alcançaram um alto grau de sucesso em seus respectivos domínios de negócios.

No geral, o visto O-1A oferece uma rota de imigração eficaz para empresários e empresários extraordinariamente talentosos. Ao atender e superar os critérios de elegibilidade, eles podem obter acesso às vastas oportunidades no mercado dos EUA, promovendo assim seus empreendimentos comerciais e contribuindo para o crescimento econômico e a diversificação dos EUA.

Conclusão 

Para empreendedores e investidores estrangeiros, várias opções de imigração nos EUA estão disponíveis: o visto E-1 tratado de comerciante, o visto E-2 de tratado de investidor, o visto L-1 de transferência dentro da empresa e o visto O-1 para indivíduos com habilidades extraordinárias . Enquanto os vistos E-1 e E-2 se concentram em comércio e investimento, respectivamente, o L-1 é para gerentes ou executivos que se transferem para uma filial nos EUA de sua empresa, e o visto O-1 reconhece conhecimentos e realizações individuais. Cada visto tem pré-requisitos exclusivos, exigindo a orientação de um advogado de imigração para a seleção da estratégia ideal. A navegação correta dessas opções abre vastas oportunidades e recursos empresariais nos EUA.

Este blog não se destina a fornecer aconselhamento jurídico e nada aqui deve ser interpretado como estabelecimento de um relacionamento advogado-cliente. Por favor, agende uma consulta com um advogado de imigração antes de agir com base em qualquer informação lida aqui.

Flavia Lloyd


Similar Posts

By Flavia Santos Lloyd July 6, 2023
Entrepreneurs and investors are key drivers of economic growth and job creation, and the United States has long been a destination of choice for those seeking to start or grow their businesses. However, navigating the U.S. immigration system can be complex and time-consuming. In this article, we will discuss the various non-immigrant visa options available to entrepreneurs and investors looking to enter the United States. L-1 Intracompany Transferee Visa The L-1 Intracompany Transferee Visa is a visa category specifically designed for executives, managers, and employees possessing specialized knowledge who are relocating from a foreign corporation to a U.S. affiliate. The eligibility for an L-1 visa requires the foreign corporation and the U.S. affiliate to be connected through common ownership or control. Transferees must also demonstrate that they have been employed abroad for at least 12 months in an executive, managerial, and specialized knowledge capacity. An employee being relocated might also be heading to the United States to set up an office if the company doesn't have an existing presence there. The L-1 visa isn't the best choice for someone in the early stages of launching a company, particularly if the business is being established in the United States. However, it could be a viable option for an entrepreneur who has, for instance, kick-started a business outside of the United States which will maintain its operations, or if the entrepreneur merges operations with a foreign company where they have previously been employed. E-1 Treaty Trader Visa E-1 Treaty Trader Visa category is designated for nationals of countries with which the U.S. maintains treaties of commerce and navigation. An entrepreneur qualifying for an E-1 visa must be entering the U.S. to carry out substantial trade, including trade in services or technology, principally between the U.S. and the treaty country. Trade, as defined, must involve an exchange of goods, money, or services. Virtually any goods or services can meet this requirement. The transaction flow between the two countries should be verifiable, typically done through documents such as purchase orders, wire transfers, or bills of lading. To determine the substantiality of the trade, the Department of State (DOS) will assess the frequency and monetary value of the transactions. More regular, high-value transactions are given greater consideration. However, smaller businesses can also qualify if they can demonstrate that the transaction volume is sufficient to support the treaty trader(s) and their family. The DOS applies a general rule stating that at least 50% of the trade must be between the United States and the treaty country. Thus, applicants should provide evidence of their total business transactions and proof that a minimum of 50% is between the two countries. The remaining trade can be domestic or international with other countries. Even if a US-based subsidiary meets the 50% requirement, the parent company abroad does not necessarily need to conduct 50% of its trade with the United States. Due to the requirement of demonstrating substantial trade history, it may be challenging for early-stage startups to qualify for an E-1. This visa type is more frequently used by established entrepreneurs with a foreign business and a US customer base, who wish to continue their operations in the US. In some instances, foreign firms aiming to penetrate the US market may use an E-1 for a newly established US subsidiary and start moving inventory for sale in the US. In this case, all trade may be between the foreign parent and US subsidiary, thereby comfortably meeting the 50% threshold. E-2 Treaty Investor Visa E-2 Treaty Investor Visa is for citizens of countries that have a treaty of commerce and navigation with the United States. To qualify for an E-2 visa, an entrepreneur must be coming to the United States to develop and direct the operations of a business in which they have invested, or are in the process of investing, a substantial amount of capital. In the classic example of an E-2 investment, the E-2 investor transfers their personal wealth from a foreign bank account into the bank account of their new US enterprise, thereby establishing their investment. However, the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) provides some flexibility, enabling the officer to consider other "arrangements" as an "investment." For those not intending to finance the E-2 enterprise entirely or partially with their personal funds, the nationality of other investors needs to be considered to ensure that at least 50% of the company shares remain in the hands of nationals from the E-2 treaty country. For instance, suppose one co-founder is American and the other is French, and they each own 50% of the company, contributing $40,000 from their personal wealth as initial capital for the company. To raise additional funds, they each decide to swap 7% of their equity (14% in total) with an angel investor for $150,000. If the angel investor is also French, then 57% of the company is now owned by French nationals; but if the angel is a U.S. citizen, then only 43% of the company is French, and it no longer qualifies as a French company for E-2 purposes. In this scenario, the founders will need to switch to another visa type before the equity exchange, as their E-2 will no longer be valid when the company loses its treaty nationality. A central concern for every E-2 application is the "source of funds." The applicant must clearly demonstrate the lawful origin of their investment funds, along with evidence of ownership and control. Moreover, to be classified as an E-2 investment, the invested assets or funds must be "at risk." This means that if the business fails, the investment is proportionately lost. Though the investment capital may be loan-based, the loan cannot be secured against the assets of the E-2 enterprise. Personal loans, which may be secured by personal assets like a second mortgage or unsecured loans typically obtained from family, friends, or business partners, are permissible. O-1 Visa The O-1 visa category is a unique and advantageous option for startup entrepreneurs and business owners who have demonstrated exceptional prowess in their field. The O-1A visa variant specifically caters to individuals exhibiting extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. This makes it a viable avenue for those looking to establish or expand their business ventures in the US without the necessity of maintaining an overseas office or providing evidence of trade and investment, as required by L-1 and E-1/E-2 visas. Unlike the more traditional visa categories, the O-1A visa shifts the emphasis onto the beneficiary's individual achievements within their domain. It demands that the beneficiary meets at least three of the eight regulatory criteria set forth by the US Immigration Services. These criteria form a comprehensive measure of the individual's accomplishments, recognition, and overall standing in their respective field. For instance, if the beneficiary has been the recipient of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards, it highlights their excellence and industry-leading competence. Alternatively, membership in prestigious associations which require commendable achievements as judged by recognized experts can also serve as evidence of their extraordinary ability. The O-1 visa offers an alternate route that places an emphasis on individual expertise and recognition in the applicant's field, rather than specific trade or investment quotas. This visa is especially beneficial for those who have demonstrated exceptional capability and achieved a high degree of success in their respective business domain. Overall, the O-1A visa offers an effective immigration route for extraordinarily talented entrepreneurs and business owners. By meeting and surpassing the eligibility criteria, they can gain access to the vast opportunities in the US market, thereby furthering their business ventures and contributing to the economic growth and diversification of the US. Conclusion For foreign entrepreneurs and investors, several U.S. immigration options are available: the E-1 treaty trader visa, the E-2 treaty investor visa, the L-1 intra-company transferee visa, and the O-1 visa for individuals with extraordinary ability. While E-1 and E-2 visas center on trade and investment respectively, the L-1 is for managers or executives transferring to a U.S. branch of their company, and the O-1 visa acknowledges individual expertise and accomplishments. Each visa has unique prerequisites, necessitating the guidance of an immigration attorney for optimal strategy selection. Correct navigation of these options opens vast U.S. entrepreneurial opportunities and resources.
By Kyle Huffman July 28, 2022
In years past, spouses of certain E and L visa categories were required to apply for and receive an Employment Authorization Document in order to work in the United States. However, as the result of a settlement reached by USCIS in the class action lawsuit Shergill v. Mayorkas on November 10, 2021, USCIS now considers E and L dependent spouses to be authorized for employment incident to their status.
By April Perez May 25, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
By Jioselin Juarez March 31, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
Show More
By Kris Quadros-Ragar February 6, 2025
On January 29, 2025, President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, significantly altering how immigration policies are enforced in the United States. This legislation grants State attorneys general and other authorized officials unprecedented authority to interpret and implement federal immigration policies. It also empowers them to take legal action against the federal government if they believe federal immigration enforcement negatively impacts their state. With this new authority, states now play a direct role in shaping immigration outcomes—a responsibility traditionally held by the federal government. One of the most immediate effects of the Laken Riley Act is that it allows states to seek injunctive relief to block the issuance of visas to nationals of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay the acceptance of their citizens who have been ordered removed from the United States . This means that if a country does not cooperate with U.S. deportation efforts, its nationals—regardless of their legal status—could face significant difficulties obtaining or renewing visas. As a result, foreign nationals from these countries may encounter increased uncertainty when traveling internationally or securing work authorization in the U.S. Beyond visa processing, the law introduces a new level of unpredictability into the immigration system. By allowing state attorneys general to intervene in federal procedures, and immigration policies that may now vary based on state-level decisions. In the coming months, it remains to be seen how individual states will wield this power—whether they will actively seek to block visa issuance or push for broader immigration enforcement measures. For foreign nationals and employers, staying informed about which countries are deemed “uncooperative” is now more important than ever. Those needing visa renewals or planning international travel should prepare for potential delays and seek professional guidance to navigate these uncertainties. The Laken Riley Act also mandates federal immigration authorities to detain and deport individuals without legal status who are charged with certain offenses, including minor theft or shoplifting, assaulting a law enforcement officer, and crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury. This provision underscores a stricter approach to immigration enforcement, affecting individuals accused of both minor and serious offenses. With immigration policies now subject to a new layer of state involvement, it is more important than ever to stay informed and prepared for potential challenges. If you have concerns about how the Laken Riley Act may affect your immigration status or business, contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for strategic counsel tailored to your needs.
By Angelica Rice January 31, 2025
On January 28, 2025, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem vacated the January 10, 2025, decision by former Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that had extended the 2023 designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuela and ordered that his January 17, 2025, notice re-designating Venezuela TPS be vacated. This action has understandably caused confusion and concern among Venezuelan TPS beneficiaries and those with pending applications. It is critical to clarify that this does not mean that the TPS program for Venezuela has been eliminated . Instead, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must now reconsider whether to re-designate (extend) or terminate the previous Venezuela TPS designations from 2021 and 2023. What Does the Vacatur Mean? Because the January 17, 2025, TPS extension was vacated, the most recent valid TPS designation for Venezuela remains the October 3, 2023, designation . The vacatur does not immediately affect TPS protections for individuals covered under the prior designations. However, DHS must make key decisions in the coming months: By February 1, 2025 , DHS must decide whether to extend or terminate the October 3, 2023, designation . By July 12, 2025 , DHS must decide whether to extend or terminate the March 9, 2021, designation . If the Secretary does not make a timely determination (for example, if the Secretary were not to make determination by February 1, 2025 whether to extend or terminate the 2023 Venezuela TPS designation), then the statute provides for an automatic extension of the designation for an additional period of 6 months . INA 244(b)(3)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(3)(C). Until these decisions are made, TPS remains in effect under the previous designations , and those who have already been granted TPS are not immediately impacted. Who Is Affected and What Should You Do? Current TPS Holders If you were already granted TPS under the March 9, 2021, or October 3, 2023, designations, your status remains valid. You must continue to comply with all re-registration requirements to maintain your protection and work authorization. Re-registration period: TPS beneficiaries under the 2021 and 2023 designations must re-register between January 17, 2025, and September 10, 2025 , to maintain their legal status and work authorization. Individuals with Pending TPS Applications as of January 17, 2025 If you applied for TPS before January 17, 2025 , under a previous designation, your application will continue to be processed . If your application is approved, your TPS protection will remain valid at least until April 2, 2025 . There is no need to reapply. Individuals Who Applied for TPS Between January 10, 2025, and January 28, 2025 If you applied for TPS during this period, USCIS will cease processing your applications and issue refunds of any fees paid in association with those applications . Additionally, USCIS will invalidate EADs; Forms 1-797, Notice of Action (Approval Notice); and Forms 1-94, Arrival/Departure Record (collectively known as TPS-related documentation) that have been issued with October 2, 2026 expiration dates under the January 17, 2025 Mayorkas Notice. What Happens Next? Given the Biden administration’s prior support for TPS, many expect DHS to extend or re-designate Venezuela for TPS rather than terminate it . However, no final decision has been made , and Venezuelan nationals with TPS or pending applications should continue to follow updates closely. What Should You Do Now? If you currently hold TPS , continue to comply with all TPS renewal requirements and remain aware of DHS’s upcoming decisions. If you have a pending application , check USCIS updates regularly and consult with an immigration attorney for the latest guidance.  If you applied between January 17, 2025, and January 28, 2025 , seek legal counsel to understand how the vacatur may affect your application. Stay Informed and Get Legal Guidance Our immigration firm is closely following these developments and will provide updates as soon as DHS makes its decision. If you have questions about your TPS status or how this memo affects your case, contact our office today for a consultation. For more information, refer to the official DHS notice on the vacatur: Vacatur of 2025 Temporary Protected Status Decision for Venezuela .
By Angelica Rice January 23, 2025
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," which aims to end birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States . This order specifically targets children born to mothers who are either unlawfully present or temporarily in the U.S. on visas, such as student, work, or tourist visas, if the father is neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident. Under this new policy, these children will no longer be granted automatic U.S. citizenship. The order is set to take effect 30 days from its signing and applies only to births occurring after that period, meaning it does not retroactively affect children born before the effective date. This executive order challenges the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born on American soil . The amendment states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." For over a century, this provision has been understood to grant citizenship to most individuals born in the U.S., regardless of their parents' immigration status. In response to the executive order, immigrant rights advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have filed lawsuits challenging its constitutionality . They argue that the order violates the clear mandate of the 14th Amendment and undermines fundamental American values. Legal experts anticipate that this issue will be contested in courts, with the potential for the order to be blocked or overturned. On January 23, 2025, a federal judge in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order (TRO), effectively blocking the executive order from taking effect for the next 14 days . The court cited potential constitutional violations and the need for further legal briefings before any enforcement could proceed. This ruling provides temporary relief to affected families and signals the likelihood of a prolonged legal battle. Further hearings are scheduled to determine whether the order will be permanently blocked or allowed to proceed. For families affected by this order, there is growing concern about the potential challenges their children may face without U.S. citizenship. Access to essential services, education, and employment opportunities could become more difficult for those impacted. However, it is important to remain hopeful, as the legal system provides checks and balances to ensure that any executive action aligns with constitutional principles. Historically, similar attempts to restrict birthright citizenship have faced significant legal challenges and have not been upheld . If you or someone you know may be impacted by this executive order, staying informed and understanding your rights is crucial. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our trusted immigration attorneys are available to provide guidance and support during this uncertain time, please contact us if you need assistance.
Show More
Share by:
WhatsApp Live Chat
WhatsApp Logo

Contact Us

×
Hello! How can we help you?