Mes examens médicaux sont-ils corrects ?

Angelica Rice • January 18, 2024

Click here to read this article in English

       Dans le cadre de la procédure de demande d'ajustement de statut (formulaire I-485) ou de la procédure de demande de visa d'immigrant (si le demandeur fait sa demande depuis l'étranger), l'USCIS exige que tous les demandeurs soient correctement vaccinés et que le formulaire I-693 d'examen médical, dûment rempli par un chirurgien civil ou un médecin agréé par l'USCIS, soit soumis à l'USCIS dans une enveloppe scellée.


       Malheureusement, de nombreux demandeurs et praticiens de l'immigration sont souvent confrontés à des situations où le chirurgien ou le médecin autorisé n'a pas effectué correctement l'examen médical, ce qui a eu des conséquences préjudiciables pour leur processus d'ajustement, notamment le refus de leur demande de formulaire I-485 ou de leur demande de visa d'immigrant.


      Tout d'abord, le chirurgien civil ou le médecin du groupe doit fournir au demandeur une copie des résultats de l'examen médical qui sont mis sous scellés et transmis à l'USCIS. De cette manière, le demandeur et/ou son avocat en droit de l'immigration peuvent consulter et vérifier les résultats avant d'envoyer l'enveloppe scellée à l'USCIS. Cela évitera que des examens médicaux remplis par erreur soient envoyés à l'USCIS et réduira les risques que le formulaire I-485 soit refusé ou qu'il subisse d'autres conséquences négatives en raison d'un examen médical défectueux.


      Deuxièmement, le demandeur ou son avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration (s'il en a un) doit examiner la copie de l'examen médical qui lui a été remis et s'assurer qu'il est conforme aux exigences de l'USCIS et du CDC en matière de vaccination. Ces exigences peuvent être consultées sur les sites web suivants:


https://www.uscis.gov/tools/designated-civil-surgeons/vaccination-requirements

https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/civil-surgeons/vaccinations.html


La loi sur l'immigration et la nationalité (INA)¹ précise que les vaccins suivants doivent être administrés ou effectués dans le cadre de l'examen médical:


  • Oreillons, rougeole, rubéole;
  • Polio;
  • Toxines tétanique et diphtérique;²
  • Coqueluche;
  • Haemophilius influenza type B; et 
  • Hépatite B.
  • Le CDC exige les vaccins supplémentaires suivants pour les besoins de l'immigration:
  • Varicelle;
  • Grippe;
  • Pneumonie à pneumocoques;
  • Rotavirus;
  • Hépatite A;
  • méningocoque; et
  • COVID-19.


      Si le demandeur n'a reçu aucun des vaccins énumérés et que les vaccins sont appropriés à son âge et à son état de santé, le demandeur présente une condition de catégorie A et est interdit de territoire. En règle générale, toutes les rangées de vaccins appropriés à l'âge du demandeur doivent comporter au moins une entrée pour que l'on puisse considérer que l'évaluation a été correctement effectuée. Toutefois, la vaccination COVID-19 (exigée à partir du 1er octobre 2021) diffère en ce sens que le demandeur doit compléter toute la série de vaccins (une ou deux doses en fonction de la formulation).³


     Afin de déterminer quels vaccins sont "adaptés à l'âge", le chirurgien civil ou le médecin du groupe doit se référer au tableau des besoins en vaccins figurant dans les instructions techniques de vaccination du CDC. Voir ce tableau ci-dessous⁴ :


      Si vous avez des questions sur les examens médicaux requis par l'USCIS ou si votre formulaire I-693 a été correctement rempli, veuillez contacter notre bureau pour obtenir de l'aide dès aujourd'hui !


¹ Voir INA 212(a)(1)(A)(ii).

² Les demandeurs qui ont terminé la série initiale DTP/DTaP/DT ou Td/Tdap doivent recevoir une injection de rappel Td/Tdap tous les 10 ans. Si la dernière dose a été administrée il y a plus de 10 ans, le demandeur doit se faire vacciner, sinon il est interdit de territoire en vertu de l'article INA 212(a)(1)(A)(ii) de la loi américaine sur l'immigration et la protection des réfugiés.

³ Pour plus d'informations, y compris les exigences actuelles en matière de dosage pour l'examen médical des immigrants, voir les CDC Requirements for Immigrant Medical Examinations (exigences des CDC pour les examens médicaux des immigrants) : COVID-19 Technical Instructions for Civil Surgeons (Instructions techniques pour les chirurgiens civils).

https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/civil-surgeons/vaccinations.html


Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

Angelica Rice

By Juliana LaMendola February 20, 2025
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order imposing new restrictions on migrants, including limitations on asylum and humanitarian protections. The order directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to terminate all categorical parole programs that conflict with U.S. policies , which includes parole processes for Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan nationals. Additionally, this provision could impact parole programs for individuals from Afghanistan, Ukraine, and other countries. Beyond restricting parole, the executive order introduces several border security measures , including building more physical barriers, increasing the number of border personnel, and stopping the use of the CBP One mobile application . The order specifically directs the Department of Defense (DOD) and DHS to build more border walls to establish what it calls “complete operational control” of the southern border. Additionally, it ordered the immediate shutdown of the CBP One mobile app, which previously allowed asylum seekers to schedule appointments at U.S. Ports of Entry. As a result, all existing appointments have been canceled immediately . The order also initiates the reinstatement of the “Remain in Mexico” program , also known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) , across all sectors of the southern border. Under MPP, asylum seekers must remain in Mexico while awaiting the outcome of their U.S. immigration court proceedings, significantly altering the process for those seeking refuge in the country. These measures reinforce the Trump administration's broader effort to restrict asylum and humanitarian protections at the U.S. border . If you or someone you know may be affected by this executive order, it is essential to stay informed and understand your legal rights. Consulting with an immigration attorney can help navigate these evolving policies and ensure the best course of action moving forward.
By Shirin Navabi February 13, 2025
The E-2 Visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows foreign investors from treaty countries to live and work in the United States by starting or purchasing a business. Unlike other visa categories, it does not require a fixed minimum investment amount. Instead, applicants must demonstrate that their investment is substantial and sufficient to ensure the success of their business. The visa is renewable indefinitely as long as the business remains active and meets the necessary criteria, making it an attractive option for entrepreneurs seeking long-term opportunities in the U.S. One of its key advantages is flexibility. Investors can establish a new business, acquire an existing one, or enter into franchise opportunities. Additionally, spouses and children under 21 can accompany the primary applicant, with spouses eligible to apply for work authorization. This makes the E-2 Visa a practical option for business-minded individuals looking to establish themselves in the U.S. market. While the E-2 Visa itself has remained a stable option, shifts in U.S. immigration policies have influenced the application process and overall investor experience. Understanding these changes is essential for anyone considering this pathway. Policy Shifts and the E-2 Visa: Lessons from the Past During the first Trump administration (2017–2021), U.S. immigration policies became more restrictive across multiple visa categories. Although the E-2 program was not directly limited, broader changes had an impact. The "Buy American, Hire American" Executive Order, signed in 2017, led to heightened scrutiny of visa applications, requiring investors to provide stronger evidence that their business would create jobs and contribute to the U.S. economy. This resulted in an increase in Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and denials for those unable to meet these expectations. Another significant change was the suspension of the Interview Waiver Program, which meant all E-2 applicants, including renewals, had to attend in-person interviews at U.S. embassies. This extended processing times and increased scrutiny of applications. Additionally, visa reciprocity agreements were reviewed and adjusted, impacting validity periods and costs for certain countries. For instance, Iranian citizens were deemed ineligible for the E-2 Visa due to the termination of the treaty. These adjustments significantly affected investors from impacted nations, increasing their costs and renewal frequency. Despite these policy shifts, the approval rate for E-2 visas remained relatively stable. According to data from the U.S. Department of State, there were over 43,000 approvals in 2019, reflecting the program’s continued viability. Even in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic caused global disruptions, approval numbers remained significant. These figures highlight that while the process became more rigorous, well-prepared investors continued to secure visas by demonstrating strong business plans, substantial investments, and clear economic contributions. What to Expect Moving Forward As the new Trump administration takes shape, further immigration policy changes are likely. While it is too soon to predict the exact impact on the E-2 Visa, past trends suggest increased scrutiny. However, the program itself has remained intact across multiple administrations, reinforcing its reliability for foreign entrepreneurs. Those considering this visa should stay informed and ensure their applications meet evolving requirements. A well-prepared investment strategy, clear documentation, and a defined job creation plan can make a significant difference in navigating any potential policy shifts. Why the E-2 Visa Remains a Strong Choice The E-2 Visa continues to be a resilient and valuable option for foreign entrepreneurs. Even during periods of policy change, approval rates have remained strong for investors with well-structured applications. The ability to renew indefinitely, combined with its flexibility in investment size and business type, makes it one of the most attractive pathways for international investors. With the right preparation, investors can confidently pursue the E-2 Visa, knowing that history has shown its stability even amid shifting political landscapes. By staying ahead of policy changes and ensuring a solid business strategy, entrepreneurs can take advantage of the opportunities the U.S. market has to offer. If you are ready to take the next step toward launching your business in the U.S., you can contact our office for expert guidance and personalized assistance with your application.
By Kris Quadros-Ragar February 6, 2025
On January 29, 2025, President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, significantly altering how immigration policies are enforced in the United States. This legislation grants State attorneys general and other authorized officials unprecedented authority to interpret and implement federal immigration policies. It also empowers them to take legal action against the federal government if they believe federal immigration enforcement negatively impacts their state. With this new authority, states now play a direct role in shaping immigration outcomes—a responsibility traditionally held by the federal government. One of the most immediate effects of the Laken Riley Act is that it allows states to seek injunctive relief to block the issuance of visas to nationals of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay the acceptance of their citizens who have been ordered removed from the United States . This means that if a country does not cooperate with U.S. deportation efforts, its nationals—regardless of their legal status—could face significant difficulties obtaining or renewing visas. As a result, foreign nationals from these countries may encounter increased uncertainty when traveling internationally or securing work authorization in the U.S. Beyond visa processing, the law introduces a new level of unpredictability into the immigration system. By allowing state attorneys general to intervene in federal procedures, and immigration policies that may now vary based on state-level decisions. In the coming months, it remains to be seen how individual states will wield this power—whether they will actively seek to block visa issuance or push for broader immigration enforcement measures. For foreign nationals and employers, staying informed about which countries are deemed “uncooperative” is now more important than ever. Those needing visa renewals or planning international travel should prepare for potential delays and seek professional guidance to navigate these uncertainties. The Laken Riley Act also mandates federal immigration authorities to detain and deport individuals without legal status who are charged with certain offenses, including minor theft or shoplifting, assaulting a law enforcement officer, and crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury. This provision underscores a stricter approach to immigration enforcement, affecting individuals accused of both minor and serious offenses. With immigration policies now subject to a new layer of state involvement, it is more important than ever to stay informed and prepared for potential challenges. If you have concerns about how the Laken Riley Act may affect your immigration status or business, contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for strategic counsel tailored to your needs.
Show More
Share by:
WhatsApp Live Chat
WhatsApp Logo

Contact Us

×
Hello! How can we help you?