Programa de Libertad Condicional para Emprendedores Internacionales (IEP)
Kyle Huffman • February 10, 2023
La revitalización de un programa suspendido temporalmente el año pasado generó entusiasmo entre los emprendedores, pero ¿qué ha sucedido desde entonces?
Click here to red this article in English
El programa de Libertad Condicional para Emprendedores Internacionales (también llamado Regla para Emprendedores Internacionales) ha tenido una historia complicada. Lo que fue diseñado para convertirse en una nueva opción relativamente simple y directa para que los emprendedores inicien nuevas empresas en los Estados Unidos se ha convertido en un proceso largo y confuso, lleno de incertidumbre, lo que lo convierte en uno de los caminos menos deseables para los extranjeros, para crear legalmente una nueva empresa en los Estados Unidos.
El IEP se creó inicialmente durante la administración de Obama en enero de 2017, durante la sesión “lame duck” o pato cojo de Obama. En teoría, el programa sonaba como una excelente oportunidad para abrir más caminos legales para que los emprendedores crearan negocios en los Estados Unidos, impulsando aún más la economía de los Estados Unidos y aliviando la carga de opciones de inmigración más intensivas. Una persona que quisiera seguir este programa tendría que demostrar que cumple con los siguientes criterios:
- Participación sustancial (al menos el 10 %) en una entidad nueva que tiene potencial para un rápido crecimiento y creación de empleo.
- El emprendedor debe tener un papel central y activo en la nueva entidad.
- La entidad recientemente creada debe haber sido creada en los Estados Unidos dentro de los últimos cinco años.
Sin embargo, lo que en teoría era un gran concepto, no se ha traducido en un programa valioso o funcional en la práctica. Poco después de que el programa se introdujera, tarde en el segundo mandato de Obama, la nueva administración Trump presentó desafíos legales al programa. Esto hizo que el programa quedara en un estado de limbo mientras los desafíos se abrían paso en los tribunales. El programa estuvo disponible por un breve período entre diciembre de 2017 y mayo de 2018 después de que un tribunal federal anuló la regla que suspendía el programa. Sin embargo, esa suspensión terminó siendo de corta duración debido a que DHS anunció en mayo de 2018 que el programa se eliminaría. En junio de 2021, la administración de Biden restableció el programa IEP.
A pesar de que el programa está activo desde hace más de un año, todavía no logra su objetivo de restaurar la fe en el sistema de inmigración de los Estados Unidos. Hubo un puñado de solicitudes del programa IEP presentadas en el período entre diciembre de 2017 y mayo de 2018, lo que resultó en solo una solicitud de IEP
exitosa bajo la administración de Trump, que hemos encontrado.
Desde el relanzamiento del programa IEP en mayo de 2021, decenas de profesionales de la ley de inmigración han presentado cientos de solicitudes. Sin embargo, todavía hay informes mínimos de aplicaciones exitosas. Además, el procesamiento premium no está disponible actualmente para las solicitudes del programa IEP, y USCIS no publica los tiempos de procesamiento posterior para estas solicitudes. Esto hace que sea casi imposible para los profesionales estimar con precisión el cronograma completo para una solicitud de IEP. Además de la falta general de solicitudes exitosas, las solicitudes que están recibiendo respuestas han sido solicitudes de evidencia que supuestamente contienen secciones significativas de lenguaje repetitivo.
Con tanta incertidumbre sobre el tiempo de procesamiento de estas solicitudes y la falta de un número significativo de resultados exitosos con más de un año de tiempo desde la reactivación del programa, no es de extrañar qué los profesionales se han sentido frustrados con la administración de Biden por este programa.
En febrero de 2022, una coalición de abogados de inmigración y partes interesadas de la industria se unieron para crear la Coalición para el Emprendimiento Internacional, que escribió una carta abierta a la administración de Biden abogando por cambios para mejorar el programa IEP. Algunos de los cambios sugeridos incluyen publicar públicamente los tiempos de procesamiento del Formulario I-941, expandir el procesamiento premium al programa IEP y cambiar el departamento dentro de USCIS que es responsable de adjudicar las solicitudes de IEP a otro departamento que ya está capacitado para manejar tipos más similares de aplicaciones. La implementación de estos cambios contribuiría en gran medida a mejorar el programa de libertad condicional para emprendedores internacionales y, en última instancia, ayudaría a la administración de Biden a lograr su objetivo de restaurar la fe en el sistema de inmigración de Estados Unidos. Con suerte, la administración de Biden implementará estos cambios pronto y ayudará al programa IEP a alcanzar su máximo potencial.
Si tiene alguna pregunta sobre lo que significa para usted el programa de libertad condicional para emprendedores internacionales, programe una consulta con uno de nuestros experimentados abogados.
If you have any questions about what the International Entrepreneur Parole program means for you, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys.
Esperamos con interés trabajar con usted.
Este blog no pretende ser un consejo legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que lea aquí.
This Facebook widget is no longer supported.
Kyle Huffman
Similar Posts

Embarking on the exhilarating journey of launching a new tech startup in the United States is a venture that blends innovation with ambition, and the dynamic landscape of the country offers an unparalleled stage for entrepreneurs to turn their groundbreaking ideas into thriving businesses. The United States highly values its position among the technology leaders of the world. In a nation fueled by a relentless pursuit of technological advancements, the process of bringing a startup to life involves navigating through a myriad of opportunities, challenges, and regulatory landscapes. This is particularly true for foreign entrepreneurs, who must also navigate the immigration system in addition to focusing on launching their businesses. Nevertheless, the United States recognizes the value in bringing technological innovators into the country and has created special considerations for immigrants with education in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) who are seeking to develop important cutting-edge technologies in the United States. These special considerations apply to the EB-2 National Interest Waiver, an immigrant visa classification which leads to permanent residency, and eventually citizenship in the United States. At the heart of every EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition is a proposed endeavor, and while these proposals for the United States can be about nearly anything, the Immigration Service is directed to recognize particular importance for proposals that aim to develop specific technologies that the Biden administration has identified as critical for U.S. competitiveness and national security. In particular, these areas of critical and emerging technologies include: Advanced Computing Advanced Engineering Materials Advanced Gas Turbine Engine Technologies Advanced Manufacturing Advanced and Networked Sensing and Signature Management Advanced Nuclear Energy Technologies Artificial Intelligence Autonomous Systems and Robotics Biotechnologies Communication and Networking Technologies Directed Energy Financial Technologies Human-Machine Interfaces Hypersonics Networked Sensors and Sensing Quantum Information Technologies Renewable Energy Generation and Storage Semiconductors and Microelectronics Space Technologies and Systems If you are a tech entrepreneur with an education in a STEM field, seeking to launch a startup in the U.S. developing any of these technologies, the EB-2 National Interest Waiver might be your ticket to permanent residency. Whether you're drawn to the iconic landscapes of Silicon Valley or the emerging tech scenes across the nation, the time is now to make your mark. If you are interested in applying for a National Interest Waiver to launch a startup in the United States, schedule an appointment with one of our skilled attorneys.

In the landscape of U.S. immigration law, the pursuit of an employment-based green card can be a significant milestone for foreign nationals aspiring to establish their careers in the United States. Among the various pathways available, self-sponsorship for an employment-based green card stands out as an option that grants individuals the ability to sponsor their own immigration journey, offering a unique opportunity for skilled professionals and entrepreneurs. Traditionally, most employment-based green card categories require an employer to sponsor the foreign national, demonstrating the need for their skills or expertise. However, certain visa categories permit self-sponsorship, allowing individuals to petition for permanent residency without a specific employer's sponsorship. These include: 1. EB-1A Extraordinary Ability: Individuals with extraordinary abilities in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics may self-petition for an employment-based green card. They must demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, providing extensive evidence of their achievements in their field. 2. EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW): This category enables individuals whose work is deemed to be in the interest of the United States to self-sponsor. Applicants must demonstrate their work's significance and how it benefits the nation as a whole. 3. EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program: Entrepreneurs investing in a new commercial enterprise that creates jobs for U.S. workers can self-petition for an employment-based green card. They must meet certain investment thresholds and fulfill job creation requirements. While these classifications have the advantage of allowing an individual to self-petition, each of these applications have distinct, stringent requirements to meet. This route can be challenging, requiring substantial evidence and a compelling case to prove extraordinary abilities or qualifications. Additionally, meeting the high standards set by USCIS for self-sponsorship can be demanding, necessitating thorough preparation and documentation. Navigating the complexities of immigration law, especially concerning self-sponsorship, often requires professional legal guidance. Seeking assistance from experienced immigration attorneys or consultants can significantly enhance the chances of a successful self-sponsored green card application, ensuring compliance with the intricate regulations and requirements. If you have any questions about what this means for you, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys. We look forward to working with you.

Great news for our EB-2 NIW clients! USCIS continues to expand on premium processing for petitioners with a pending I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers under the EB-2 and EB-2 classifications. This third phase only applies to previously filed Form I-140 petitions under the E13 multinational executive and manager classification or E21 classification as a member of professions with advanced degrees or exceptional ability seeking a national interest waiver (NIW). Clients who are eligible for a premium processing upgrade as of USCIS' announcement on September 15, 2022 are E13 multinational executive and manager petitions received on or before January 1, 2022; and E21 NIW petitions received on or before February 1, 2022 Eligible petitions may submit Form I-907 to USCIS with the required filing fee of $2,500. The premium processing timeframe is 45 days from the date USCIS receives the request for premium processing. Santos Lloyd has been steadily receiving I-140 decisions, so we anticipate that more decisions will be coming throughout the next few months until the end of the year. We will continue to keep updated on policy changes and updates from USCIS and will post updates regularly on these changes. For clients who are eligible and interested in the upgrade, please contact our office for further information. If you are not yet eligible for the upgrade, please await further information from USCIS as we anticipate more phases coming in the months to come.

We have continued to have great results in our EB-2 National Interest Waiver cases this month. During the month of September, our firm received over a dozen National Interest Waiver Approvals, with none being denied. These approvals were for people from a diverse set of professional backgrounds including entrepreneurs, restaurateurs, a medical professional, soccer coach, electrician, travel agency, and more. These individuals and their families are now looking forward to permanent residency in the United States. If you have any questions about what this topic means for you, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys. We look forward to working with you.

In the span of about five weeks, U.S. visa policy changed in ways that affect close to 100 countries. A Presidential Proclamation issued on December 16, 2025, expanded an earlier travel ban to cover 39 countries effective January 1, 2026. Two weeks later, the Department of State announced a separate administrative pause on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries, effective January 21, 2026. The two policies overlap in places, diverge in others, and together create one of the broadest restrictions on U.S. visa issuance in recent memory. For applicants and employers trying to make sense of the news, the most important point is this: the rules differ depending on (a) which country the applicant is from, (b) which visa category they are seeking, and (c) where they were on January 1, 2026. Below is a practical guide to what is in place, what is still available, and what to do next. Two Distinct Policies, One Confused Headline What the press has often called "the visa freeze" is actually two separate policies, with different legal foundations and different scopes. Presidential Proclamation 10998 the 39-country travel ban. Signed December 16, 2025, and effective January 1, 2026, this proclamation supersedes and expands the June 2025 travel ban. It invokes INA §§ 212(f) and 215(a) the same legal authority that the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. Hawaii (2018) — and divides affected countries into two tiers. The State Department's 75-country immigrant visa pause. Announced on January 14, 2026, and effective January 21, 2026, this is an internal Department of State policy, not a presidential proclamation. It freezes immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries on a stated rationale of public charge concerns. It has been challenged in court (CLINIC v. U.S. Department of State, S.D.N.Y., filed February 2, 2026) on grounds including the INA's prohibition on nationality-based discrimination in immigrant visa issuance. Because the policies operate independently, an applicant from a country that appears on both lists faces overlapping restrictions, while an applicant from a country on only one list faces a narrower set. Tier 1: Full Suspension Under Proclamation 10998 (19 Countries) Nationals of these 19 countries are subject to a full suspension of both immigrant and nonimmigrant visa issuance: Afghanistan, Burma, Burkina Faso, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Mali, Niger, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. The proclamation also applies to individuals traveling on documents issued or endorsed by the Palestinian Authority. For applicants in this tier, no tourist, student, work, or immigrant visas will generally be issued, subject to a narrow set of exceptions discussed below. Tier 2: Partial Suspension Under Proclamation 10998 (19 Countries + Turkmenistan) Nationals of these 19 countries are subject to a partial suspension: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Togo, Tonga, Venezuela, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. For these countries, the proclamation suspends: All immigrant visas, and B-1/B-2 visitor visas, F and M student visas, and J exchange visitor visas. Critically, employment-based and other nonimmigrant categories including H, L, O, P, and R visas remain available to nationals of these countries, although consular officers are directed to reduce the validity period of any such visa to the minimum extent permitted by law. For our firm's many clients in the entertainment, sports, and business immigration space, this distinction is often the difference between a paused career and a viable plan. Turkmenistan occupies a unique position: under the December proclamation, only immigrant visa issuance is suspended; nonimmigrant categories remain available. The Separate State Department Pause (75 Countries) The January 21, 2026 State Department policy paused issuance of immigrant visas only to nationals of 75 countries. The list is broader than the Proclamation 10998 list and notably includes countries with significant client populations for our firm, such as Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Guatemala, Lebanon, Morocco, Nicaragua, Pakistan, and many others. Two practical points are essential: The pause is limited to immigrant visas. Nonimmigrant visas including B-1/B-2, F-1, J-1, H, L, O, P, and R are not affected by this policy. A Brazilian artist seeking an O-1, a Colombian executive seeking an L-1, or a Lebanese professional seeking an H-1B can generally continue to apply. The policy is being challenged in court. Plaintiffs in CLINIC v. State Department argue that the freeze violates INA § 1152's prohibition on nationality-based discrimination in immigrant visa issuance, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Fifth Amendment. The outcome is not predictable, and applicants should not delay strategic planning while awaiting a ruling. Who Is Exempt or Otherwise Unaffected Several categories of individuals are not covered by Proclamation 10998, even where their country of nationality appears on the list: Lawful permanent residents of the United States. Green card holders may continue to travel and re-enter, though re-entry can still involve closer secondary inspection. Individuals physically present in the United States on January 1, 2026. The proclamation applies only to those who were outside the U.S. and without a valid visa as of the effective date. Holders of valid visas issued before January 1, 2026. No visa issued before the effective date has been or will be revoked under the proclamation. These visas may continue to be used for travel. Dual nationals who can apply on the passport of a country not subject to the suspension. A, G, and NATO visa holders , certain Special Immigrant Visa applicants, and limited national interest exceptions, including for specific adoption-related cases. It is worth emphasizing that exemption from the entry ban is not the same as exemption from related USCIS processing holds. Some lawful permanent residents from affected countries have nonetheless experienced delays on naturalization (N-400) and family petition (I-130) processing under separate administrative directives. What Applicants Should Do Now Given how rapidly the rules are changing and how case-specific the consequences are, we are advising clients to take the following steps: Identify which list (or lists) applies to you. A national of Iran or Syria faces fundamentally different exposure than a national of Brazil or Colombia, even though both may have heard "visa freeze" in the news. Look at categories, not just countries. For Tier 2 countries and the 75-country pause, employment-based nonimmigrant categories remain a viable path. Many of the O-1, P-1, H-1B, L-1, and EB-1A pathways our firm regularly handles are unaffected by the immigrant-visa freeze. Consider where you are physically located. Applicants currently in the United States have planning options that applicants abroad may not. Departing the country at the wrong moment can convert an inconvenience into a years-long problem. Do not assume current valid visas remain a guarantee of admission. While valid visas are not being revoked, port-of-entry scrutiny has increased, and discretionary admission decisions are ultimately made by Customs and Border Protection. Seek counsel before international travel if you are from any affected country, hold any form of conditional or pending status, or have any concerns about prior immigration history. When to Consult an Attorney The combination of the Proclamation 10998 travel ban, the 75-country immigrant visa pause, ongoing litigation, and the additional USCIS holds on certain benefit applications has produced a landscape where the right answer is rarely obvious from the news alone. Speaking with counsel is especially important when: Your country appears on either list, and you have a pending or planned visa application. You are weighing whether to leave the United States for a consular interview. You are an employer with a foreign national workforce and need to understand which categories remain viable. You are a dual national considering which passport to use. You hold a valid visa from before January 1, 2026, and are uncertain whether to travel. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we represent clients from across the affected country lists including substantial numbers in entertainment, sports, business, and family immigration and we are actively monitoring both the litigation and the State Department's evolving guidance. If you have questions about how the current restrictions apply to your case or your company, our attorneys are available to help you build a plan.

Holding a U.S. visa does not guarantee permanent entry. The Department of State can cancel a visa after it is issued through a process called “prudential visa revocation.” These revocations have surged throughout 2025 and 2026. This increase is a direct result of enhanced vetting and increased data sharing between government agencies. Through the Continuous Vetting Center, law enforcement and immigration databases are now cross-referenced in real time, allowing officials to flag and revoke visas the moment new information surfaces or updated information is received, such as a past criminal arrest or a security alert. What is Prudential Visa Revocation? A prudential revocation is a precautionary cancellation. It happens when new information suggests a traveler might be ineligible for a visa or could pose a safety concern. A revocation cancels your visa, but it does not automatically end your status if you are already inside the U.S. and following the rules of your stay. Common triggers include: Criminal Arrests (DUI/DWI): Even a previous incident or single arrest without a conviction can trigger an immediate revocation. Security Alerts: New hits on watchlists or intelligence databases. Loss of Eligibility: Such as losing a job or failing to maintain student status. Fraud: Discovery of errors or lies on previous applications. The DOS usually notifies individuals via the email address listed on their DS-160 application. However, many travelers reportedly only discover the revocation when they are denied boarding at the airport. If your visa is revoked while you are in the U.S., you can typically remain in the country until the date on your Form I-94 expires, provided you continue to follow all terms of your stay. However, you should avoid international travel until you consult with legal counsel, as leaving the U.S. will require you to apply for a brand-new visa to re-enter. This application process may involve extra scrutiny, such as medical evaluations or supplemental documentation - especially if the revocation was triggered by a DUI or DWI. If your visa has been revoked and you need to discuss your legal options, please contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for guidance.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has recently updated its protocols regarding the screening and vetting of immigration benefit applications. These changes involve a more detailed review process that may impact processing times and evidence requirements for various categories of benefits. Key Changes to the Adjudication Process The updated guidance outlines several shifts in how USCIS processes and reviews applications: Adjustment of EAD Validity Periods: For certain categories, the validity periods of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) may be shortened. This can result in more frequent eligibility reviews throughout the application process. Expanded Use of Social Media and Financial Data: Adjudicators have been granted broader authority to review an applicant’s social media activity and financial history during the vetting process. Policy Updates on Biometric Verification: The agency is revising its approach to biometric identity verification, including the reuse of fingerprints and photographs. Country-Specific Scrutiny: USCIS is coordinating with the Department of State to apply specific analysis to applications based on regional risk factors and fraud indicators. Impact on Interviews and Processing Applicants for adjustment of status, naturalization, and other benefits may encounter more focused questioning during interviews. USCIS is now tailoring its interview process to address potential red flags associated with specific geographic regions or benefit categories. Because of this increased scrutiny, it is essential that all information provided in an application is consistent with an applicant's public record and digital footprint. Discrepancies or incomplete documentation can result in delays or additional requests for evidence. Next Steps As these procedures are implemented, applicants should ensure that all submitted materials are accurate and verifiable. We recommend a thorough review of all public information and documentation prior to filing. If you have questions regarding how these procedural changes may affect your specific case, our team is available to discuss the current requirements and help navigate the updated process.

