Action positive de l'État en matière d'immigration
Kyle Huffman • November 10, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
Ces derniers mois, une grande partie de la conversation publique et de la couverture médiatique autour de l'immigration a été largement négative. La Floride, en particulier, a dominé le cycle de l'information sur l'immigration avec l'adoption et la mise en œuvre de la loi SB 1718, qui, entre autres choses, a renforcé le pouvoir des forces de l'ordre de l'État d'appliquer les lois fédérales sur l'immigration.
Bien que l'accent ait été mis sur les développements négatifs, d'autres États ont fait de grands progrès pour améliorer le système d'immigration. Il est important de souligner ces initiatives.
Deux États ont récemment fait des efforts pour améliorer l'accès à l'éducation des résidents immigrés. L'un de ces États est le Minnesota, qui a introduit le projet de loi HF 2073. Le projet de loi est actuellement en cours d'examen, mais s'il est adopté, il fournira des fonds supplémentaires aux collèges et universités de l'État du Minnesota et modifiera les programmes de subventions existants. Ces changements comprennent une aide accrue aux frais de scolarité pour les familles à faibles revenus, indépendamment du statut d'immigrant, ce qui permettra à de nombreuses personnes qui ne pouvaient auparavant pas accéder à ces avantages en raison de leur statut d'immigrant, de bénéficier d'une aide aux frais de scolarité. De même, la Chambre des représentants de l'État de l'Utah a adopté la loi HB 102, qui étend l'application des taux de scolarité dans les universités de l'Utah aux réfugiés, aux asilés et aux personnes en liberté conditionnelle pour des raisons humanitaires. Ces changements devraient réduire considérablement les frais de scolarité de ces groupes dans l'enseignement supérieur, permettant ainsi à ces personnes d'améliorer leur propre éducation et d'acquérir des connaissances et des compétences utilisables sur le marché du travail.
Outre l'amélioration de l'accès à l'enseignement supérieur, plusieurs États se tournent vers la réforme de l'immigration pour combler les lacunes du marché du travail. Par exemple, le Maryland a supprimé l'obligation de résidence permanente pour l'obtention d'une licence, ce qui permet aux résidents non immigrants qualifiés de pratiquer la médecine et, en fin de compte, de contribuer à atténuer la pénurie de main-d'œuvre dans le domaine des soins médicaux. De même, le Tennessee a adopté la loi SB 1451, qui facilite le processus d'obtention d'une licence médicale américaine pour les professionnels qui ont été éduqués et formés dans d'autres pays et sous d'autres systèmes. L'Arizona, quant à lui, a adopté le SB 1563, qui crée une nouvelle commission chargée d'étudier les obstacles inutiles à l'entrée sur le marché du travail auxquels sont confrontés les nouveaux Américains, dans le but de faciliter l'entrée sur le marché du travail et, en fin de compte, d'apporter une contribution importante à l'économie nationale.
En l'absence d'une réforme globale et radicale de l'immigration au niveau fédéral, nous constatons une tendance croissante des États à prendre des mesures dans ce domaine du droit, traditionnellement dominé par la politique et l'application fédérales. Nous continuerons à suivre l'évolution de la situation État par État, en première ligne de la réforme de l'immigration.
Si vous avez des questions sur ce que cela signifie pour vous, n'hésitez pas à prendre rendez-vous avec l'un de nos avocats expérimentés.
Nous nous ferons un plaisir de travailler avec vous.
Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.
Starting July 10, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is implementing a strict new rule regarding signatures on immigration benefit requests. Taking this change seriously is crucial, as the consequences for submitting an invalid signature are severe and costly. Under the new rule, USCIS officers have the authority to deny your filing if they discover an invalid signature during the adjudication process, even if your application was already accepted and you were issued a receipt notice. If your case is denied for a signature defect, USCIS will not allow you to fix or "cure" the mistake. You will be forced to submit an entirely new petition and pay a new filing fee, which could result in missed deadlines, delayed work authorization, or even the loss of your legal status. USCIS officers may use imaging tools during adjudication to closely compare signatures across your previous filings to detect inconsistencies or copy-and-pasted images of signatures. Under the new rules, USCIS strictly considers several types of signatures to be invalid, including software-generated or digital signatures, such as those created by DocuSign, as well as copy-and-pasted or inserted images of signatures reused across multiple forms. Furthermore, stamped or typewritten names are prohibited, along with any signatures executed by anyone other than the authorized requestor, such as an attorney, interpreter, or preparer. Because USCIS now has expanded authority to outright deny cases and keep filing fees over signature defects, it is highly recommended that you adopt a practice of using wet-ink signatures for not just USCIS forms, but all documents submitted in your petition such as recommendation letters or personal statements. Thus, any upcoming petition you are filing with USCIS must include original, handwritten, “wet-ink” signatures. While USCIS does allow you to submit a scanned, photocopied, or faxed version of your application, the copy you upload or mail must be of a document that was physically signed in wet ink. Audit your signature practices before the July 10, 2026, implementation date to protect your filing fees and ensure your immigration case stays safely on track.
Navigating U.S. immigration law can often feel like learning a completely new language. Two terms that frequently confuse are lawful status and a period of authorized stay. While they sound similar and both relate to your ability to remain in the United States, they are distinct legal concepts. Understanding the difference is critical. Mixing them up can accidentally lead to visa violations, unlawful presence, and severe long-term immigration consequences. 1. What is Lawful Status? Lawful status means you have been officially granted the right to be in the United States by the U.S. government, and that right is currently active. You hold a lawful status if you are: A U.S. citizen or national. A Lawful Permanent Resident (Green Card holder) or Conditional Permanent Resident. A nonimmigrant who was lawfully admitted to the country for a temporary period (such as on a tourist, student, or work visa). For temporary visa holders, your lawful status is directly tied to your Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record). As long as the date on your I-94 has not passed, and you are actively following the rules of your visa - such as maintaining a full course load on an F-1 student visa or working only for your approved sponsor on an H-1B visa - you are in lawful status. 2. What is a Period of Authorized Stay? A period of authorized stay is essentially a temporary legal buffer. It means the government allows you to physically remain in the country for the time being, but you do not hold an active, lawful status. The most common way to enter this buffer zone is by filing to extend, change, or adjust your visa status before your current permission expires. While you wait for USCIS to make a decision, your Form I-94 expiration date will often pass. At that exact moment, your active lawful status officially ends. However, because you submitted your application on time, you automatically enter a period of authorized stay for as long as your case remains pending. It is important to note that, while this authorized stay stops you from accruing unlawful presence (the dangerous clock that triggers multi-year reentry bars), it does not grant you a formal legal status, nor does it completely shield you from the initiation of removal (deportation) proceedings. It functions as a temporary stay, not a permanent safety net. If USCIS denies your application and your original visa has already expired, your temporary buffer zone vanishes instantly. The consequences are immediate and serious: since you no longer hold a valid status or a pending case, you no longer have legal permission to be in the country, giving the government the right to start removal proceedings. To avoid these highly stressful risks, the safest strategy is to maintain a valid underlying status when possible. If you are currently waiting on a pending application or have questions about your options, our office is here to help you navigate the system safely. Reach out to us today to schedule a consultation.
Navigating the immigration landscape as a professional athlete can feel as demanding as a championship final, but understanding the P-1A visa can help you to plan ahead and successfully petition USCIS when the time comes to apply. For individual athletes like surfers, Rodeo cowboys, or Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu fighters, the P-1A serves as the primary gateway to competing in the United States. While it is often compared to the O-1 visa, the P-1A has a distinct threshold that is more easily accessible than the O-1; rather than proving "extraordinary ability," you must demonstrate "international recognition". This means your achievements must be renowned or leading in more than one country, showcasing a level of skill that is substantially above the ordinary. For those competing in individual sports, the spotlight is entirely on your personal accolades and standing rather than a team or league’s reputation as in the case of a team sport athlete. You must show that you are personally well-known within your sport across multiple countries, and that the U.S. events you intend to enter typically draw other internationally recognized participants. One of the most significant advantages for the solo competitor is the duration of stay, as individual athletes can often secure a P-1 visa for an initial period of up to five years, which can eventually be extended to a total of ten. This stands in stark contrast to team athletes, who are generally limited to the duration of a specific season or contract with a team. If you are looking to be proactive about your future eligibility, you should treat your career milestones as a collection of evidence for the "Two-Out-of-Seven" rule used by USCIS. To qualify, you must provide evidence satisfying at least two of the following seven criteria: Evidence of having participated to a significant extent in a prior season with a major U.S. sports league. Evidence of participation in an international competition with a national team. Evidence of having participated to a significant extent in a prior season for a U.S. college or university in intercollegiate competition. A written statement from an official of a major U.S. sports league or the governing body of the sport detailing your international recognition. A written statement from a member of the sports media or a recognized expert. Evidence that you or your team is ranked, if the sport has international rankings. Evidence that you or your team has received a significant honor or award in the sport. Building your resume with these specific benchmarks in mind is essential. Here are some suggestions to help an individual sport athlete to meet these criteria and successfully qualify for a P-1A visa: First, you should actively seek opportunities to represent your national team or strive for high international rankings , as these are concrete proof of your standing. If you are working with an immigration attorney, make sure they have a clear understanding of your sport, how its governing body determines rankings, and the significance of your accomplishments- successfully showing USCIS why your rankings or results indicate you are performing at an elite and internationally recognized level is key to a successful outcome. Beyond the trophies, your professional network plays a crucial role ; cultivating relationships with recognized experts or sports media members who can provide written statements will significantly strengthen your future petition. Major media articles that discuss your accomplishments or explain the significance of competitions or rankings you feature in, can also have a strong positive impact on your case. As you prepare, remember that every petition also requires a formal consultation letter from an appropriate labor organization , if one exists that covers your sport. A good immigration attorney will help you to identify the appropriate labor organization and engage with them on your behalf to secure the consultation letter you need. Generally, they will want to see the same evidence that USCIS will be evaluating, and they may need some time to review your petition prior to issuing you a consultation letter. Finally, you will also need a written contract with an employer or agent within the United States, and a detailed itinerary of the events where you will perform . Your immigration attorney can also help you to structure your contract with your agent or employer, and guide you in creating an itinerary based on the events or competitions you will participate in. While every individual sport is different, USCIS will want to see that you have set up a structure that will pay you a living wage to perform your sport, and that you have planned out an itinerary of competitions or events in sufficient detail that covers the entire period of time for which you are requesting the P-1A visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., we are experienced in helping talented individuals who are accomplished in many different sports to continue their careers here in the United States. If you are such an athlete interested in competing here, please contact us, and we will be happy to discuss your case.
