Eu dei entrada em um I-751, mas estou me divorciando e o divórcio não é definitivo, o que acontece agora?
Angelica Rice • May 4, 2022
Click here to read this article in English
Se você e seu cônjuge eram casados há menos de 2 anos no momento de sua entrevista I-485 (Ajuste de Status) e seu pedido foi aprovado, seu status de residente permanente legal é condicional e uma petição separada para remover essas condições (I- 751) deve ser apresentada dentro de 90 dias da data de expiração do seu Green Card.
Uma petição I-751 é uma petição conjunta, apresentada pelo titular do Green Card e seu cônjuge, que solicita que o USCIS remova as condições e emita o status de residente permanente e um novo Green Card de 10 anos. No entanto, e se depois de preencher a petição I-751, você e seu cônjuge decidirem se divorciar?
Em tais situações, o titular do Green Card pode solicitar a dispensa (“Waiver”) da exigência de petição conjunta e enviar essa solicitação com sua petição I-751. Mesmo que você solicite a dispensa da I-751 conjunta, você ainda deve mostrar que o casamento foi originalmente celebrado de boa fé. Isso significa que você ainda precisará provar ao USCIS que entrou no casamento por amor e não apenas para obter um Green Card. A prova de boa-fé pode incluir, mas não se limita a, certidão de casamento, documentos conjuntos, certidões de nascimento de filhos nascidos do casamento, etc.
Documentação que pode/deve ser submetida com a sua petição I-751 de dispensa inclui copiado seu green card, documentação referente as circunstâncias envolvendo o fim do seu casamento, evidência que o casamento foi contraído em boa-fé, cópia da sentença de divórcio (ou evidência que o os procedimentos de divórcio foram iniciados, se não finalizados), declaração sua sobre as circunstâncias, etc.
O USCIS revisa os pedidos de dispensa caso a caso. A orientação atual da política do USICS indica que se uma solicitação de dispensa for feita e o divórcio ainda não for final, o USCIS deve emitir uma Solicitação de Prova (RFE) com um período de resposta de até 87 dias. No RFE, o oficial solicitara que você forneça uma cópia da sentença final do divórcio e uma declaração sua oficialmente pedindo que a petição I-751 seja convertida em um pedido de dispensa (se não foi ainda fornecido), juntamente com quaisquer outros documentos que eles julgarem necessários para decidir o caso.
Contanto que você possa fornecer esses documentos ao USCIS até o prazo de resposta, o oficial pode alterar a petição I-751 indicando que você é elegível para dispensa com base no fim do casamento e pode julgar a petição como tal sem a necessidade de refazer o pedido. O USCIS avaliará se o requisito de boa-fé foi ou não atendido e poderá agendar o caso para uma entrevista pessoal. Se o pedido for aprovado, você receberá seu Green Card de 10 anos. Se o pedido for negado, seu caso poderá ser encaminhado ao tribunal de imigração e você poderá ser colocado em processo de remoção.
Os casos de dispensa de I-751 são um assunto complicado. Se você ou alguém que você conhece se encontra em uma situação como a mencionada acima, entre em contato com nossos experientes advogados de imigração do Santos Lloyd Law Firm para obter assistência em seu caso.
Este blog não tem o propósito de ser um aconselhamento jurídico e nada aqui deve ser construído como o estabelecimento de um relacionamento advogado-cliente. Por favor, agende uma consulta com um advogado de imigração antes de agir sobre qualquer informação lida aqui.
Translated by Kathya Dawe
Similar Posts
Your conditional resident status is only valid for 2 years. In order to prevent losing lawful status in the United States, you must submit Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence, 90 days before your conditional green card expires. It is critical that you file Form I-751 to remove the conditions in a timely manner because if it is not, you may risk being left without status and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security may issue you a Notice to Appear and place you in removal proceedings before an Immigration Judge.
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish If you and your spouse were married for less than 2 years at the time of your I-485 ( Adjustment of Status ) interview and your application was approved, your lawful permanent resident status is conditional and a separate petition to remove those conditions (I-751 petition) must be filed within 90 days of the expiration date on your Green Card. An I-751 petition is a joint petition, filed by the Green Card holder and their spouse, that requests USCIS remove the conditions and issue you permanent resident status and a new 10-year Green Card. However, what if after filing the I-751 petition, you and your spouse decide to get divorced? In such situations, the Green Card holder can request a waiver of the joint petition filing requirement and submit this request with their I-751 petition. Even if you are requesting an I-751 waiver, you must still show that the marriage was originally entered into in good faith. This means that you will still need to prove to USCIS that you entered into the marriage for love and not just to obtain a Green Card. Evidence of good faith can include, but is not limited to, the marriage certificate, joint documents, birth certificates of children born of the marriage, etc. Documentation that can/should be submitted with your I-751 waiver request include copy of your green card, documentation regarding the circumstances surrounding the end of your marriage, evidence that the marriage was entered into in good faith, copy of the divorce decree (or evidence that divorce proceedings have been initiated if not yet final), statement from you regarding the circumstances, etc. USCIS reviews waiver requests on a case-by-case basis. Current USCIS policy guidance indicates that if a waiver request is made and the divorce is not yet final, USCIS should issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) with a response period of up to 87 days. In the RFE, the officer will request that you provide a copy of the final divorce decree and a statement from you officially asking that the I-751 petition be converted to a waiver application (if not already provided), along with any other documents they deem necessary to decide the case. As long as you can provide these documents to USCIS by the response deadline, the officer can amend the I-751 petition indicating that you are eligible for a waiver based on the termination of the marriage and can adjudicate the petition as such without the need to re-file the application. USCIS will then evaluate whether or not the good faith requirement has been met and may schedule the case for an in-person interview. If the application is approved, then you will be issued your 10-year Green Card. If the application is denied, then your case may be referred to immigration court and you may be placed in removal proceedings. I-751 waiver cases are a complicated matter. If you or someone you know find themselves in a situation like the one mentioned above, please contact our experienced immigration attorneys at Santos Lloyd Law Firm for assistance with your case.
Family-based immigration remains one of the most common paths to lawful permanent residency in the United States. It offers a lifeline to families hoping to reunite across borders, but the process is far from simple. The outcome of the applications can be delayed as a result of potential missteps while preparing the applications. Here are some of the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them: Incomplete or Inaccurate Forms One frequent mistake is submitting incomplete or inaccurate information on the forms like the I-130 (Petition for Alien Relative) and the I-485 (Adjustment of Status). Even minor errors such as misspelled names, missing signatures, or incorrect dates—can result in Requests for Evidence. To avoid this misstep, double-check all entries, cross-reference documents, and consult with an attorney before submission. Remember, immigration forms are legal documents so accuracy matters. Insufficient Supporting Evidence Proving a genuine familial relationship is the basis of family-based petitions. For spousal cases, USCIS looks closely at evidence of a bona fide marriage. Little or no supporting documents and evidence may lead to Requests for Evidence and even skepticism from USCIS. To establish a bona fide marriage, include documentation to show shared finances and liabilities. Filing Under the Wrong Category or Preference There are different immigration paths depending on whether the petitioner is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, and whether the beneficiary is a spouse, child, sibling, or parent. Each category has different processing times and visa availability. It is critical that before applying, you understand which preference category applies to your case. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (spouses, parents, unmarried children under 21) generally receive faster processing and are not subject to annual visa caps. Not Disclosing Past Immigration or Criminal History Many applicants fail to account for past immigration violations such as visa overstays, unauthorized work, or prior removal orders. Similarly, if you fail to disclose past criminal history and these issues surface later in the process they can affect the outcome of the case. Disclose everything to your attorney, no matter how minor or old the issue seems. Prior violations don’t always mean denial but not disclosing them may lead to serious consequences. If you're considering filing a family-based petition, consult with an experienced immigration attorney at our office. Our office is committed to helping families navigate this complex process with clarity and confidence.
When applying for a green card or seeking admission into the United States, one of the legal hurdles many applicants may face is the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This test evaluates whether someone is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support. But what exactly does that mean—and what types of public benefits can trigger this issue? In this article, we’ll break down what “public charge” really means, who is affected, what types of public benefits are considered, and what immigrants should be mindful of when making decisions about public programs like Medi-Cal and Medicaid. What Is the Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility? The public charge rule applies to individuals applying for a visa, green card (adjustment of status), or entry into the U.S., unless they fall into an exempt category. Under this rule, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must determine whether the applicant is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. This typically refers to receiving: Public cash assistance for income maintenance (such as SSI or TANF), or Long-term institutional care at government expense. This determination is based on the "totality of circumstances," including age, health, financial resources, education, skills, and whether a sponsor has submitted a valid Affidavit of Support. Who Is Exempt from the Public Charge Rule? Many categories of immigrants are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. These include: Asylees and refugees Special immigrant juveniles Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners T and U visa applicants Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Importantly, even if someone later adjusts status through a different pathway that is subject to public charge, any benefits they received while in an exempt category will not be held against them. What Public Benefits Are Not Considered in the Public Charge Test? It is a common and harmful myth that using any public benefit will jeopardize your immigration status. In fact, most non-cash benefits do not count against you in a public charge determination. According to USCIS and DHS guidance, the following types of assistance (current as of July 1, 2025) are not considered: Health-Related Benefits Medi-Cal/Medicaid, except for long-term institutional care Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Health insurance through the ACA Marketplace, including subsidies COVID-19 testing, vaccines, and treatment Community health services, crisis counseling, and short-term shelters Food and Nutrition SNAP (Food Stamps) WIC School meal programs Food banks and emergency food assistance Housing and Energy Emergency shelter Rental assistance (e.g., McKinney-Vento programs) Energy assistance (e.g., LIHEAP) Education and Childcare Public schooling Head Start Childcare subsidies (e.g., CCDF) Educational grants and scholarships Federal Cash and Tax Benefits Earned income tax credit (EITC) Child Tax Credit (CTC) Stimulus checks Unemployment insurance Social Security and veteran’s benefits Disaster and pandemic-related cash aid In short, just because a benefit is public or government-funded doesn’t automatically make it count against you. A Word of Caution About Medi-Cal and Medicaid, in Particular As of today (07/01/2025), standard use of Medi-Cal (California’s version of Medicaid) or Medicaid for most health-related services is not considered in a public charge determination. This includes preventative care, emergency services, pregnancy-related services, and short-term care. However, if Medicaid is used for long-term institutionalization, such as in a nursing home or psychiatric facility, that does count under the public charge test. Despite current guidance, we are seeing political shifts and changes in tone from the current administration that suggest public charge policies may become more restrictive in the future. This includes renewed interest in expanding the types of public benefits that may be considered, particularly around medical assistance. For that reason, we generally recommend that individuals who are applying for adjustment of status, or who may be subject to the public charge ground in the future, avoid enrolling in Medi-Cal or Medicaid at this time, unless absolutely necessary. Final Thoughts Immigration law is complex, and the rules surrounding public charge can feel confusing or even frightening. But it’s important to understand that using most public benefits—especially for food, education, and healthcare—will not automatically jeopardize your green card or visa application. Still, because policy can change quickly, we urge individuals to consult with an immigration attorney before applying for any public assistance—especially healthcare programs like Medi-Cal or Medicaid. If you have questions or concerns about how public benefits might impact your immigration case, our office is here to help. We are committed to providing up-to-date, personalized guidance to keep your immigration journey on track. Disclaimer The information provided herein is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every immigration case is unique, and the application of the public charge rule may vary depending on your specific situation. If you believe this topic may apply to you or you need individualized legal guidance, we encourage you to contact one of our highly-qualified legal professionals for a consultation and assistance tailored to your circumstances. Resources: USCIS Public Charge Resources ILRC Medi-Cal and Public Charge Alert (2024) California Medi-Cal Immigrant Eligibility FAQ
As an immigration law firm, we regularly assist highly skilled professionals working in the U.S. on temporary work visas such as H-1B who are seeking a path to permanent residency. For many of these individuals, the EB-2 and EB-3 employment-based green card categories are the most pursued—and frequently misunderstood—routes . While both are viable pathways to permanent residency, they differ in meaningful ways that can significantly impact the timing, eligibility, and overall strategy of your case. The EB-2 category is intended for individuals who either hold an advanced degree or demonstrate exceptional ability in their field . Most applicants qualify by having a master’s degree (or higher), or a bachelor’s degree accompanied by at least five years of progressive experience in their profession. There is also a subcategory within EB-2 known as the National Interest Waiver (NIW), which allows qualified individuals to self-petition without employer sponsorship if their work substantially benefits the United States. This route is especially relevant for researchers, entrepreneurs, and professionals in high national interest or mission-critical fields. In contrast, the EB-3 category includes professionals with a bachelor’s degree as well as skilled workers with at least two years of training or experience . While the educational threshold for EB-3 may appear less rigorous, the process itself is equally structured. One key distinction between EB-2 and EB-3 lies in the requirements of the job being offered, not just the applicant’s own credentials. For example, if a position requires only a bachelor’s degree, even a highly qualified candidate with a master’s degree may still fall under EB-3. Regardless of which category applies, most employment-based green card cases begin with the PERM labor certification process . This is a formal procedure overseen by the U.S. Department of Labor, in which the employer must test the labor market and demonstrate that there are no able, willing, qualified, and available U.S. workers for the position. The employer must also agree to pay the prevailing wage as determined by the Department of Labor. This step is both mandatory and highly detail-sensitive; inaccuracies in the job description, recruitment steps, or wage determination can lead to significant delays or even denials. Once PERM certification is approved, the employer files Form I-140 , the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. This petition confirms that the employee meets the requirements for the offered position under either EB-2 or EB-3, and that the employer is financially capable of providing the job as described. If the employee’s priority date—which is based on the date the PERM was filed—is current according to the Department of State’s Visa Bulletin, the individual may then file Form I-485 to adjust their status to lawful permanent resident. One of the more nuanced aspects of this process involves understanding how priority dates and visa backlogs affect the timeline. For applicants from countries with high demand, such as India or China, significant delays are common—particularly under EB-2. Paradoxically, there are times when the EB-3 category moves faster, prompting some applicants to file a second I-140 under EB-3 while retaining the original priority date. This strategy can be effective but requires careful legal planning to ensure it’s done correctly. Another strategic factor is portability. If your I-485 application has been pending for at least 180 days and your I-140 has been approved, you may be eligible to change employers under the AC21 portability provisions, so long as the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification. This flexibility can be critical for employees who experience job changes or promotions during the often lengthy green card process. Ultimately, the choice between EB-2 and EB-3 isn’t about prestige —it’s about aligning your qualifications, the job requirements, and your immigration history with current legal standards and market conditions. The right strategy depends not only on your education and experience, but also on your long-term career goals and country of origin. At our firm, we work closely with both employers and employees to develop individualized immigration strategies that streamline the process and avoid unnecessary setbacks. Whether you're a corporate professional evaluating your green card options or an employer preparing to sponsor a key team member, we offer the insight and experience to move your case forward with confidence.
